• Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
Money Rise Today – Investing and Stock News
  • Investing
  • Stock
Investing

Google’s antitrust ruling draws parallels to Microsoft’s 25-year-old case: Here’s how

by August 7, 2024
written by August 7, 2024

A significant ruling by US Judge Amit Mehta has determined that Google holds a monopoly in the internet search market, reminiscent of the historic antitrust case against Microsoft. This judgment has marked a pivotal moment in the ongoing scrutiny of major technology companies and their market practices.

The case, initiated by the US government in 2020, accused Google of maintaining its search market dominance through the establishment of formidable barriers to entry and feedback mechanisms that solidified its position.

Judge Mehta’s ruling, spanning 300 pages, found Google in violation of Section 2 of the Sherman Act, which prohibits monopolistic practices.

Comparisons with Microsoft’s 1999 antitrust case

The ruling draws clear parallels with the 1999 antitrust case against Microsoft, where the software giant was found to have used its Windows operating system to stifle competition from rival browsers like Netscape Navigator. A settlement in 2001 required Microsoft to stop disadvantaging competitors in PC deals.

Judge Mehta highlighted the similarity in how both companies leveraged their dominant market positions. He noted that just as Microsoft’s agreements restricted Navigator’s market penetration, Google’s distribution agreements have curtailed the search volumes of its competitors, thereby protecting Google’s market share.

A key aspect of Google’s strategy, as identified in the ruling, is the “power of the default”. Google’s agreements with Apple and Samsung, which cost billions of dollars annually, ensure that Google remains the default search engine on these popular devices, a position that significantly limits user migration to rival search engines.

Implications for Google’s business practices

A separate trial scheduled for 4th September will determine the penalties or remedies that Google will face. During this trial, Google has the option to appeal, a process that could extend over two years, akin to Microsoft’s appeal and subsequent settlement with the Department of Justice (DOJ).

Legal experts suggest that the court might mandate Google to terminate certain exclusive agreements and make it simpler for users to access other search engines. Although financial penalties are possible, the more substantial risk to Google lies in potential changes to its business practices, which could impact its profitability. For instance, losing its default search status on smartphones could lead to a significant reduction in Google’s core search business.

In the second quarter, “Google Search & Other” generated $48.5 billion in revenue, constituting 57% of Alphabet’s total revenue. Any mandated changes could, therefore, have a profound impact on the company’s financial performance.

The role of artificial intelligence in the competition

In its defense, Google is likely to argue that the competitive landscape has evolved with the advent of artificial intelligence (AI). This new dynamic was not present when the DOJ filed its initial lawsuit. Google might introduce evidence showing how AI developments have intensified competition, a point it has tried to minimize in the wake of the rise of AI-driven services like OpenAI’s ChatGPT.

Neil Chilson, former chief technologist for the Federal Trade Commission, noted that AI could indeed disrupt Google’s market dominance. He suggested that while the court’s definition of the market currently implicates Google, emerging technologies in search and advertising could present significant competition.

Uncertainty for investors and potential outcomes

Following the ruling, Google’s shares saw a minor decline, reflecting broader market trends rather than a direct response to the judgment. Investors remain cautious as Judge Mehta did not outline potential remedies, leaving significant uncertainty.

Experts believe that while a breakup of Google is unlikely, changes to its business model could be on the horizon. Unlike the Microsoft case, where distinct business lines could be spun off, Google’s integrated services present a more complex scenario for potential divestiture.

The upcoming trial is expected to clarify these issues. Bill Baer, former head of antitrust divisions at both the FTC and DOJ, indicated that the Microsoft case precedent strengthens the argument against Google. The specifics of what the DOJ will seek and what the judge will approve remain uncertain.

The post Google’s antitrust ruling draws parallels to Microsoft’s 25-year-old case: Here’s how appeared first on Invezz

0 comment
0
FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

previous post
TD Cowen downgrades Molson Coors, lowers price target to $58: Is it time to exit?
next post
UK economy post-pandemic growth stronger than earlier estimated, ONS data shows

related articles

Asian markets close: Nikkei, Kospi down; Sensex closes...

May 19, 2025

Qualcomm unveils AI chips for data centres with...

May 19, 2025

Best crypto to buy now: Bitcoin Pepe leads...

May 19, 2025

JPMorgan cuts Netflix rating, citing balanced risk-reward post-rally;...

May 19, 2025

Bitcoin ETF open interest dips 5% to $29.47B...

May 19, 2025

US stocks slip in the red on Monday:...

May 19, 2025

Should Klarna IPO remain on watch list after...

May 19, 2025

Why this brokerage downgraded UnitedHealth’s rating to ‘hold’

May 19, 2025

Nvidia opens NVLink Fusion ecosystem, expands Taiwan footprint...

May 19, 2025

Cathie Wood says Trump’s tariffs could unlock tech...

May 19, 2025
Enter Your Information Below To Receive Free Trading Ideas, Latest News, And Articles.


Your information is secure and your privacy is protected. By opting in you agree to receive emails from us. Remember that you can opt-out any time, we hate spam too!

Latest News

  • Funeral held for Shiri Bibas and her sons after their remains handed over by Hamas

    February 26, 2025
  • Trump announces new ‘serious power’ fighter jets for Michigan Guard base to replace aging A-10s

    April 29, 2025
  • Is Perplexity AI really a threat to Google Search?

    August 12, 2024
  • Rio Tinto considers $32 billion acquisition of Canadian mining giant Teck Resources

    July 12, 2024
  • India launches strikes on terrorist camps in Pakistan

    May 6, 2025

Popular Posts

  • 1

    Secret Service admits leaning on ‘state and local partners’ after claim it ignored Trump team’s past requests

    July 21, 2024
  • 2

    Elon and Vivek should tackle US funding for this boondoogle organization and score a multimillion dollar win

    December 4, 2024
  • 3

    Forex Profit Calculator: Maximize Your Trading Potential

    July 10, 2024
  • 4

    Five more House Democrats call on Biden to drop out, third US senator

    July 19, 2024
  • 5

    Biden calls to ‘lower the temperature’ then bashes Trump in NAACP speech

    July 17, 2024

Categories

  • Economy (829)
  • Editor's Pick (4,680)
  • Investing (624)
  • Stock (767)

Latest Posts

  • Vital Western alliance countries’ heavy dependence on China major problem: ‘dangerously exposed’

    August 3, 2024
  • Trump suggests US could join British Commonwealth if offered by King Charles

    March 22, 2025
  • His brothers’ keeper: Liran Berman calls for urgent action to save his brothers, Gali and Ziv, from Hamas

    March 27, 2025

Recent Posts

  • SpaceX launch scrubbed hours after Hegseth shares message to rescue mission crew: ‘Wish you Godspeed’

    March 13, 2025
  • Trump rules out two GOP stalwarts from joining his administration: ‘Will not be inviting’

    November 10, 2024
  • Supreme Court rules on status of tens of thousands of fired probationary employees

    April 8, 2025

Editor’s Pick

  • Hunter Biden pardon raises new questions over 5th Amendment ‘loophole’

    December 3, 2024
  • EURUSD and GBPUSD: GBPUSD climbs to a new August high

    August 21, 2024
  • Harris now the second Dem candidate to lose to Trump and not speak to supporters on election night

    November 6, 2024
  • About us
  • Contacts
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions

Disclaimer: moneyrisetoday.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

Copyright © 2025 moneyrisetoday.com | All Rights Reserved

Money Rise Today – Investing and Stock News
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
Money Rise Today – Investing and Stock News
  • Investing
  • Stock