• Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
Money Rise Today – Investing and Stock News
  • Investing
  • Stock
Editor's Pick

Roy quizzes DOJ on ‘coordination’ with left-wing groups over suits challenging states’ voter roll purges

by November 1, 2024
written by November 1, 2024

: A top House Republican is questioning the Department of Justice about what he says is ‘apparent coordination’ with left-wing civil rights groups over its lawsuits against two Republican-led states over efforts to remove non-citizens from its voter rolls.

‘The Subcommittee on the Constitution and Limited Government is conducting oversight of the apparent coordination between the Civil Rights Division and left-wing advocacy groups to impede the ability of states to ensure the accuracy of their voter rolls,’ Rep. Chip Roy, R-Texas, who is chairman of the subcommittee, says in a letter obtained by Fox Digital.

The Department of Justice sued Alabama and Virginia in recent months over their moves to remove non-citizens from the voter rolls. The DOJ has claimed that the states have violated clauses that say states must complete their maintenance program no later than 90 days before an election under a clause known as the Quiet Period Provision.

‘This systematic voter removal program, which the State is conducting within 90 days of the upcoming federal election, violates the Quiet Period Provision,’ the DOJ said as it filed suit against Virginia. 

Virginia has insisted that the state’s process is ‘individualized’ and conducted in accordance with state and federal law. A lower court ordered 1,600 individuals to be restored to the voter rolls, but that has since been blocked by the Supreme Court.

The DOJ sued Alabama on similar grounds, alleging that changes to the voter registration lists took place 84 days before Election Day.

‘The right to vote is one of the most sacred rights in our democracy,’ Assistant Attorney General Kristen Clarke of the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division said in a statement. ‘As Election Day approaches, it is critical that Alabama redress voter confusion resulting from its list maintenance mailings sent in violation of federal law.’

But Roy says the lawsuits from the DOJ came after lawsuits by left-wing civil rights groups. In the letter, Roy says that the Sept. 27 Alabama lawsuit came weeks after a Sept. 13 lawsuit from a coalition of left-wing civil rights groups. The cases were consolidated on Sept. 28.

In Virginia, a civil rights lawsuit was filed on Oct. 7, and the DOJ filed its lawsuit on Oct. 11. 

‘The cases involve the same or similar plaintiffs and lawyers and follow a similar pattern with respect to the timing of each complaint. These circumstances raise questions as to whether the DOJ’s Civil Rights Division is working with these groups to file cases to keep noncitizens on voter rolls just before the 2024 election and prevent states from ensuring that only eligible citizens vote in federal elections,’ Roy says.

He also says the DOJ ‘did not object to consolidating its cases with those filed by left-wing organizations and attorneys with a public history of opposing bipartisan efforts to prevent noncitizens from voting.’

Roy says many of the groups have objected to the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act, which would require proof of citizenship to vote in federal elections. 

‘The American people deserve to know whether left-wing activist groups are dictating the DOJ’s legal strategy with respect to noncitizens voting in the upcoming election,’ he writes.

Roy is asking for all documents and communications relating to the lawsuits and any of the civil rights groups involved in the suits, as well as documents to show whether the DOJ plans to file any additional lawsuits against the states.

Virginia was handed a legal victory this week when the Supreme Court halted the lower court’s decision to reinstate 1,600 potential noncitizens to the rolls. A divided court granted the state’s stay application pending appeal in the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals on Wednesday. Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented. 

The DOJ said in a statement Wednesday after the Supreme Court’s ruling, ‘The Department brought this suit to ensure that every eligible American citizen can vote in our elections. We disagree with the Supreme Court’s order.’

Fox News’ Haley Chi-Sing contributed to this report.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS
0 comment
0
FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

previous post
Harris billionaire surrogate’s suggestion Trump women are dumb comes on heels of Biden’s ‘garbage’ comment
next post
Mark Cuban tries to ‘clarify’ after comment on ‘The View’ widely seen as insult toward pro-Trump women

related articles

From Biden’s ‘war’ on gas prices to ‘small...

March 13, 2026

US diplomatic facility in Iraq struck by drone

March 13, 2026

From Biden’s ‘war’ on gas prices to ‘small...

March 13, 2026

171 million travelers face airport delays as Democrats’...

March 13, 2026

FDA launches new AI-powered system to track drug...

March 13, 2026

Cornyn reverses on filibuster stance to push Trump’s...

March 13, 2026

DAVID MARCUS: Sen Thune has no idea how...

March 13, 2026

Trump touts 5-0 sweep by endorsed candidates in...

March 13, 2026

US destroys 16 Iranian mine boats as Strait...

March 13, 2026

House GOP urges Trump to choke off Iran...

March 13, 2026
Enter Your Information Below To Receive Free Trading Ideas, Latest News, And Articles.


Your information is secure and your privacy is protected. By opting in you agree to receive emails from us. Remember that you can opt-out any time, we hate spam too!

Latest News

  • Dogecoin and Shiba Inu are falling to new weekly lows

    October 1, 2024
  • ‘Independent-minded’: DCCC chair reveals blueprint for winning back majority during 2026 midterms

    December 24, 2024
  • Europe markets open: Stoxx 600 dips as UK exports nosedive & Trump’s tariff claims sow chaos

    June 12, 2025
  • FBI Director Christopher Wray announces resignation

    December 11, 2024
  • Left-wing movie director Oliver Stone rips Democrats’ ‘lying’ Russiagate probe against Trump

    April 6, 2025

Popular Posts

  • 1

    District judges’ orders blocking Trump agenda face hearing in top Senate committee

    April 2, 2025
  • 2

    Secret Service admits leaning on ‘state and local partners’ after claim it ignored Trump team’s past requests

    July 21, 2024
  • 3

    Five more House Democrats call on Biden to drop out, third US senator

    July 19, 2024
  • 4

    Forex Profit Calculator: Maximize Your Trading Potential

    July 10, 2024
  • 5

    CoreWeave eyes $1.5B bond raise to ease debt load following lacklustre IPO: report

    May 9, 2025

Categories

  • Economy (829)
  • Editor's Pick (8,376)
  • Investing (1,189)
  • Stock (981)

Latest Posts

  • Incoming Trump admin, Congress showdown looms with South Africa over support for Russia, US foes

    December 26, 2024
  • Chipotle says restaurants will give bigger servings after complaints over measly portions

    July 28, 2024
  • GOP lawmaker joins Democrat-led effort to limit Trump’s pardon power

    February 16, 2026

Recent Posts

  • Filecoin (FIL) plummets 12% despite growing ecosystem and Grayscale recognition

    July 25, 2024
  • Ratcliffe shrugs off concerns about potential threat of fired agents armed with CIA’s secrets

    February 26, 2025
  • SpaceX launch scrubbed hours after Hegseth shares message to rescue mission crew: ‘Wish you Godspeed’

    March 13, 2025

Editor’s Pick

  • JD Vance, Treasury Sec Scott Bessent to meet with Zelenskyy as Trump team sets sights on Russia-Ukraine war

    February 11, 2025
  • White House announces new defensive military deployments to aide Israel against Iran, proxies

    August 2, 2024
  • FBI agents group tells Congress to take urgent action to protect against politicization

    February 4, 2025
  • About us
  • Contacts
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions

Disclaimer: moneyrisetoday.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

Copyright © 2025 moneyrisetoday.com | All Rights Reserved

Money Rise Today – Investing and Stock News
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
Money Rise Today – Investing and Stock News
  • Investing
  • Stock