• Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
Money Rise Today – Investing and Stock News
  • Investing
  • Stock
Editor's Pick

Biden, Democrats back away from bill that would give Trump more federal judges to appoint

by December 11, 2024
written by December 11, 2024

President Biden and key Democrats are now opposing a once bipartisan bill that would have authorized 63 new permanent district judgeships now that President-elect Donald Trump would be the one to fill 21 of those slots once he takes office.

The Senate in August passed the ‘Judicial Understaffing Delays Getting Emergencies Solved Act’ or the ‘JUDGES Act of 2024,’ which staggers the 63 new permanent judgeships the president may choose over the next 10 years. Citing how courts are burdened by heavy caseloads, the bill says the president shall appoint 11 of those permanent judgeships in 2025 and 11 more in 2027. The president would tap another 10 judges in 2029, 11 in 2031, 10 in 2033 and 10 more in 2035, the bill says. 

Democrats are decrying how the bill did not come to a vote in the House before the election – when control of the next presidency, and therefore which party would choose those next 21 judges, still hung in the balance. 

The White House released a statement on Tuesday saying Biden would now veto the bill if it came to his desk. 

‘While judicial staffing is important to the rule of law, S. 4199 is unnecessary to the efficient and effective administration of justice,’ the White House said. ‘The bill would create new judgeships in states where Senators have sought to hold open existing judicial vacancies. Those efforts to hold open vacancies suggest that concerns about judicial economy and caseload are not the true motivating force behind passage of this bill now.’ 

‘In addition, neither the House nor the Senate fully explored how the work of senior status judges and magistrate judges affects the need for new judgeships,’ the White House continued. ‘Further, the Senate passed this bill in August, but the House refused to take it up until after the election. Hastily adding judges with just a few weeks left in the 118th Congress would fail to resolve key questions in the legislation, especially regarding how the judges are allocated.’ 

During a House Rules Committee hearing on Monday, Rep. Chip Roy, R-N.C., and House Judiciary Committee chair Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, made the argument that a significant number of districts in states, regardless of their political make-up, have sounded the alarm about staffing shortages worsening the backlogs of cases. However, despite the significant need, they argued, the appointment process has become politicized.

‘We need the number of judges,’ Rep. Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y., the ranking member on the House Judiciary Committee, admitted. ‘However, President Trump has shown, he bragged that by his three appointments, he overturned Roe v. Wade. He said he was going to do it. He did it. So don’t tell me it’s not political.’ 

‘Under this legislation, we all promised to give the next three unknown presidents a certain number of judges,’ Nadler said. ‘Because no one can tell the future we were all at an equal disadvantage, but for this deal to work, the bill had to be passed before Election Day.’

The bill text cites how as of March 31, 2023, there were 686,797 pending cases in the district courts across the country, with an average of 491 weighted case filings per judgeship over a 12-month period.

Shortly before the White House released its statement signaling Biden would veto the bill, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., gave a speech noting how the JUDGES Act passed the Senate by unanimous consent in August.

The bipartisan support, McConnell argued, proved ‘that the right to a speedy trial still enjoys overwhelming popularity.’ 

‘I was particularly encouraged by the vocal endorsement of our friend, the Democratic leader, who recognized the measure as, quote, ‘very responsible, bipartisan and prudent bill that would lead to a better functioning judiciary.’ Soon, we expect the House to take up and pass the JUDGES Act with similar overwhelming support,’ McConnell said. ‘And normally, we could rest assured that such popular action would be signed into law without further ado. But maybe not this time.’ 

‘Last week, the White House seemed to suggest, through anonymous comment that President Biden has concerns with the bill. I, for one, would be curious to hear the president’s rationale. It’s hard to imagine a justification for blocking the JUDGES Act that doesn’t smack of naked partisanship,’ McConnell, who did lead the GOP effort to block former President Obama’s appointment of Merrick Garland to the Supreme Court, said. ‘It’s almost inconceivable that a lame duck president would consider vetoing such an obviously prudential step for any reason other than selfish spite.’

‘Litigants across America deserve their day in court,’ he said. ‘They deserve to know the federal judiciary has the bandwidth to carefully and thoroughly consider their cases. The president, former chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, is well equipped to appreciate this fact, and I hope he acts accordingly.’ 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS
0 comment
0
FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

previous post
How the New York Mets can justify paying one player $765 million
next post
How the Olympics helped transform Salt Lake City into a tech hub

related articles

Musk officially steps down from DOGE after wrapping...

May 29, 2025

State Department says it will ‘aggressively’ revoke visas...

May 29, 2025

HHS slams ‘under-tested’ mRNA technology as Trump cuts...

May 29, 2025

Senators condemn fatal shooting of Israeli embassy employees...

May 28, 2025

Israeli ambassador slams UN’s ‘mafia-like’ tactics against US-backed...

May 28, 2025

Explosive new intelligence report reveals Iran’s nuclear weapons...

May 28, 2025

Trump says he will meet with Putin, Zelenskyy...

May 28, 2025

Trump nominates former defense attorney Emil Bove for...

May 28, 2025

Trump confirms he told Netanyahu to back off...

May 28, 2025

Senate Republican campaign committee ‘grills’ Chuck Schumer on...

May 28, 2025
Enter Your Information Below To Receive Free Trading Ideas, Latest News, And Articles.


Your information is secure and your privacy is protected. By opting in you agree to receive emails from us. Remember that you can opt-out any time, we hate spam too!

Latest News

  • ‘Star Wars’ actor Mark Hamill weighs in on Kamala Harris’ chances of victory

    August 22, 2024
  • TQQQ stock price prediction and other information

    September 3, 2024
  • State, Treasury Departments reimposes ‘maximum pressure’ sanctions on Iran’s oil trade

    February 24, 2025
  • Federal judge accuses President Biden of attempting to ‘rewrite history’ in Hunter Biden pardon

    December 4, 2024
  • Fed rate cuts in September could boost General Motors’ profitability, CFO predicts

    July 23, 2024

Popular Posts

  • 1

    Secret Service admits leaning on ‘state and local partners’ after claim it ignored Trump team’s past requests

    July 21, 2024
  • 2

    Elon and Vivek should tackle US funding for this boondoogle organization and score a multimillion dollar win

    December 4, 2024
  • 3

    Forex Profit Calculator: Maximize Your Trading Potential

    July 10, 2024
  • 4

    Five more House Democrats call on Biden to drop out, third US senator

    July 19, 2024
  • 5

    Biden calls to ‘lower the temperature’ then bashes Trump in NAACP speech

    July 17, 2024

Categories

  • Economy (829)
  • Editor's Pick (4,696)
  • Investing (624)
  • Stock (770)

Latest Posts

  • Blagojevich has new job working for ‘Bosnian Bear’ politician with ties to Putin

    April 3, 2025
  • 4th round of US-Iran talks ends as Trump set to embark on historic Middle East tour

    May 12, 2025
  • Biden’s past comments about MAGA Republicans come back to haunt him as White House spins ‘garbage’ remarks

    October 31, 2024

Recent Posts

  • TikTok parent company dismisses intern who it says ‘maliciously interfered’ with its AI technology

    October 22, 2024
  • Solana whale offloads additional $2.8 million in latest move, totaling $86 million in selloff

    August 14, 2024
  • ‘DOGE caucus is dead,’ House Democrat declares

    May 14, 2025

Editor’s Pick

  • 3 things Dr. Oz can do as CMS administrator to help fix American health care

    November 25, 2024
  • Dems test out attack on Trump’s age with Biden now out of race

    July 22, 2024
  • Bernie Sanders disagrees, but Trump keeps insisting Harris is more liberal than the Vermont senator

    August 13, 2024
  • About us
  • Contacts
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions

Disclaimer: moneyrisetoday.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

Copyright © 2025 moneyrisetoday.com | All Rights Reserved

Money Rise Today – Investing and Stock News
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
Money Rise Today – Investing and Stock News
  • Investing
  • Stock