• Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
Money Rise Today – Investing and Stock News
  • Investing
  • Stock
Editor's Pick

Republicans conquered abortion in 2024. Will they do so in 2026?

by December 16, 2024
written by December 16, 2024

One of the most famous Sherlock Holmes stories pivots on what Sherlock notes: the curious incident of the dog in the night. When the Scotland Yard inspector says the dog did nothing in the night, Sherlock explains that was what was curious. Understanding why the dog didn’t bark was essential to solving the mystery.  

In our case, many political professionals, in the best Scotland Yard fashion, have noted that in the 2024 election, abortion ‘did nothing.’ That’s a starkly different outcome than what Democrats expected, based on the post-Dobbs 0-for-12 loss record (with the results in Virginia in 2023 being counted as a draw), on abortion-related ballot initiatives and special elections, and crushing expected red waves.  

Why was 2024 different? Did abortion just disappear as a concern, overwhelmed by the economy and illegal immigration? Or was there something that kept that dog from barking? The answer matters to future elections. 

In early 2024, my firm, Suasion Insights, began research both nationally and with a deep dive in Pennsylvania, tasked with seeing if there was any way pro-life Republicans could at least neutralize the abortion issue without abandoning their principles. 

We shared our findings with federal GOP campaigns and organizations, starting with five foundational insights on what was driving, and triggering, those otherwise getable voters they were losing over this issue. 

First, for 48% nationally, rough agreement with — i.e., not fearing — a candidate on abortion is a gateway requirement to then considering other issues.  

Second, 50% think the GOP can’t be trusted on abortion, and two-thirds of Americans think Republicans lack empathy. 

Third, the term ‘pro-life’ has a toxic brand/perception outside of the pro-life community, meaning opposition to all abortions — maybe also opposition to exceptions (which are very important to voters), including possibly for the life of the mother. (The Left understands this, which is why even bills that only restrict abortion for late in a pregnancy are described as a ban, stoking the fears that a total ban is the real intent.) 

Moreover, the label ‘pro-life’ means support for only the fetus, not the woman (a problem when only 8% nationally think the baby is more important throughout the pregnancy) and a hypocritical support for ‘life’ given likely simultaneous approval of the death penalty, support for guns, and opposition to funding for pre- and post-natal care, rare disease testing and social support through people’s lives. 

Fourth, and in contrast, ‘pro-choice’ has a centrist brand perception, seen as a catchall, including anything from a six-week limit to unrestricted abortion. Moreover, pro-choice voters assume that, of course, Democrats don’t want abortions, and that late-term abortions are not only few but medically necessary, making GOP rhetoric not credible. 

Fifth, voters across all groups are open to supporting candidates who support less restrictive policies than their personal preferences, but not more restrictive. The post-Dobbs abortion ballot initiative track record illustrates this point: no state ballot initiative that would make that state’s law more restrictive has passed.  

But our research also showed a winning message would stop politicizing abortion — a trap Democrats fell into with, for example, their overwrought ad of the woman on the floor dying while a GOP senator prevents her from getting treatment for a miscarriage. 

We showed there were better ways for Republicans to express their empathy and concerns for women and their needs at this difficult time, both individually and necessarily as a party.  

We were gratified to see the GOP change their platform language as the old language would have been used as a club against every GOP candidate. President-elect Donald Trump talked about exceptions whenever he spoke about abortion. He explicitly ruled out a federal law. And most GOP candidates were very clear that, like the top of the ticket, they opposed any national ban. 

You could hear the air come out of the abortion issue for the left, something that only accelerated after Vice President-elect JD Vance’s debate with Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, which was a masterclass in reassuring women that this wasn’t a game to make every state look like Alabama.  

 

Vance never pivoted from the issue. He never used the term ‘pro-life.’ He began with empathy, not politics or policy, telling the story of a woman he loves who had an abortion that she felt saved her life. He acknowledged there were different opinions on the issue. He talked about the need for Republicans to rebuild trust. 

He used the high-ground, pro-woman argument: we need to give women control (affordability, family planning/contraception/fertility treatments) to solve the real problem (unwanted pregnancies), not just focus on the symptoms of the problem (abortion). He did not talk about adoption and foster care, which are seen more as anti-abortion than pro-woman, but did reclaim freedom and talked about childcare and fertility, two big issues for women. 

Even when he went on offense, he did not talk in the usual activist way about ‘killing babies’ or use other emotional language that backfires but stuck with facts and the idea that the left goes ‘too far’ — the way most people talk. He was clear in his opposition to a ban and never used the word ‘ban’ outside of the context of partial-birth abortions.  

He reminded us we are a diverse country and underlined the importance of letting voters decide. In recognizing that different states will have different policies, Vance showed that he is listening to women and voters and recognizes the need to win back trust, hearts and minds. 

We showed there were better ways for Republicans to express their empathy and concerns for women and their needs at this difficult time, both individually and necessarily as a party.  

Changing how the GOP was perceived on the issue of abortion, minimizing fear and being empathetic and reassuring was the dog that didn’t bark and made it possible for voters to focus on the other issues. 

As we look forward to future elections, the question will be: will the pro-life movement and GOP politicians learn how to neutralize the issue, so they don’t lose more ground? Will they in fact choose to win (because there is a way they could get nearly 70% support for their less extreme positions)? Or will they revert to barking in the way that satisfies their most hardcore supporters while creating collateral losses elsewhere? Only time will tell. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS
0 comment
0
FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

previous post
McKinsey & Co. to pay $650M to settle opioid consulting probe, ex-partner to plead guilty
next post
Mitt Romney names who he thinks will be the GOP’s 2028 presidential nominee

related articles

Department of Justice opens criminal investigation into NY...

May 9, 2025

Trump’s first vice president urges his old boss...

May 9, 2025

White House highlights over $2B in savings from...

May 8, 2025

GOP talk on millionaire tax hike ‘makes no...

May 8, 2025

GOP senators: Congress should vote on Trump’s potential...

May 8, 2025

Trump considers tax hike on Americans making $2.5...

May 8, 2025

Chief Justice Roberts doubles down on defense of...

May 8, 2025

Trump pulls his nomination for DC US attorney,...

May 8, 2025

Trump touts ‘rebuilding and modernization’ of US air...

May 8, 2025

Trump targets Iranian oil with sanctions, increasing pressure...

May 8, 2025
Enter Your Information Below To Receive Free Trading Ideas, Latest News, And Articles.


Your information is secure and your privacy is protected. By opting in you agree to receive emails from us. Remember that you can opt-out any time, we hate spam too!

Latest News

  • ‘Safer, stronger, and freer’: Securing the border set to feature large in Noem’s opening remarks to Senate

    January 17, 2025
  • Biden-Harris administration using taxpayer money to mask Medicare premium hikes before election: critics

    August 14, 2024
  • Trump delivers different message on Gaza when recapping call with Netanyahu

    April 26, 2025
  • Mike Pence aims to be ‘constructive force’ during Trump’s second term while willing to challenge him

    February 18, 2025
  • Vance eviscerates ‘Soviet’-style European censorship in address to Munich Security Conference

    February 14, 2025

Popular Posts

  • 1

    Secret Service admits leaning on ‘state and local partners’ after claim it ignored Trump team’s past requests

    July 21, 2024
  • 2

    Elon and Vivek should tackle US funding for this boondoogle organization and score a multimillion dollar win

    December 4, 2024
  • 3

    Forex Profit Calculator: Maximize Your Trading Potential

    July 10, 2024
  • 4

    Five more House Democrats call on Biden to drop out, third US senator

    July 19, 2024
  • 5

    Biden calls to ‘lower the temperature’ then bashes Trump in NAACP speech

    July 17, 2024

Categories

  • Economy (829)
  • Editor's Pick (4,433)
  • Investing (593)
  • Stock (735)

Latest Posts

  • Senate advances Trump’s pick to lead the US Interior, Doug Burgum, to confirmation vote

    January 30, 2025
  • Russell 2000 Futures Rapidly Draw to July’s Peak

    July 15, 2024
  • ‘The pendulum is swinging’: Experts weigh in on historic SCOTUS transgender case amid oral arguments

    December 5, 2024

Recent Posts

  • Who could run to replace Stefanik in the House?

    November 12, 2024
  • Elon Musk’s political influence: a billionaire’s impact on European democracy

    January 7, 2025
  • Qatar agrees to kick Hamas out of Doha after request from Biden administration

    November 9, 2024

Editor’s Pick

  • Fed’s Stagflation Warning Impacts Crypto Markets

    April 21, 2025
  • Hamas launches first attack on Israel since ceasefire collapse

    March 20, 2025
  • Trump officials list 5 weekly accomplishments ahead of Musk midnight deadline

    February 25, 2025
  • About us
  • Contacts
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Email Whitelisting

Disclaimer: moneyrisetoday.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

Copyright © 2025 moneyrisetoday.com | All Rights Reserved

Money Rise Today – Investing and Stock News
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
Money Rise Today – Investing and Stock News
  • Investing
  • Stock