• Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
Money Rise Today – Investing and Stock News
  • Investing
  • Stock
Editor's Pick

Don’t worry. There is a common sense response to the surgeon general’s alcohol and cancer warning

by January 11, 2025
written by January 11, 2025

As 2025 kicked off, many Americans began their quest for a healthier year ahead by committing to more exercise, a renewed focus on mental well-being, a healthier diet, and ‘Dry January’ (that is, a month without alcohol consumption). Then U.S. Surgeon General Vivek Murthy released his latest advisory linking alcohol to an increased risk of cancer.  

Specifically, the advisory highlighted an increased risk in mouth, throat, esophagus, voice box, breast (in women), liver, and colon and rectum cancers among those who consume any amount of alcohol. Further, the report states that alcohol consumption leads to 100,000 cancer cases and 20,000 cancer-related deaths in the U.S. each year, making it the third leading preventable cause of cancer after tobacco and obesity. 

I believe many of us have long suspected alcohol was not necessarily ‘good’ for us. But what I think we did not know – or perhaps did not want to fully acknowledge – was just how bad it could be for our health. In fact, 60% of Americans report being unaware of the relationship between alcohol and cancer. Hopefully, this advisory begins the process of educating the public of this important health-related link. 

Since the advisory’s publication, Americans have raised numerous questions about what the government may do next, what the findings mean for them, and how they should consider the findings in their daily lives.  

Here’s what to know and to keep in mind. 

How does alcohol cause cancer? 

From a 30,000-foot view, alcohol damages your DNA, which increases your cancer risk. This occurs through several different mechanisms. For example, our DNA can be damaged by acetaldehyde, the toxic metabolite alcohol is broken down to in our body, or by the oxidative stress alcohol causes.  

Alcohol also alters hormone levels in our body, such as estrogen, which likely explains alcohol’s relationship with increased breast cancer risk. Not only does alcohol directly damage our DNA, but it also increases the absorption of cancer-causing chemicals, or carcinogens, into the body. So, while we may think of a glass of wine or beer as calming or relaxing for our body, it – in fact – does the exact opposite, causing inflammation.  

What comes next? 

The advisory lays the groundwork for action – by the government, physicians and our fellow Americans. 

Murthy suggests that the surgeon general’s warning label on alcohol be updated to clearly note the link between alcohol and cancer. Such a labeling change would require an act of Congress, and I believe this should be done quickly on a bipartisan basis. What’s one thing we can all rally behind? Reducing cancer among our family, friends and neighbors. 

However, this is not a ‘silver bullet’ strategy. While one study assessing cigarette warning labels showed that more comprehensive, larger, and graphic labels better communicate health risks of smoking to the public, another suggested they did not have an actual effect on smoking behavior.  

So, if we extrapolate what this may mean for the future impact of an updated surgeon general’s warning label on alcohol, the effect may be nominal. Further, it is important to note that this was the result despite the cancer risk being substantially higher for cigarettes than alcohol when they’re consumed at comparable amounts. 

But updating the warning label is a start to the needed education to raise general awareness and physician ‘buy-in’ that Murthy also highlights are important ‘action items.’ We must work collaboratively to increase knowledge of the alcohol and cancer risk relationship, not only in the media but in more personal settings, such as doctors’ offices and across our local communities. A targeted strategy is needed to deliver on the potential of an education program to reduce alcohol consumption. 

Lastly, we must always make sure that policy follows the latest, up-to-date science. It’s OK to not know, but we need to be clear with the public when that is the case. For example, the current definition of moderate drinking (one drink or less per day for women and two drinks or less per day for men [one drink is 12 ounces of beer, five ounces of wine, or 1.5 ounces of liquor]) is relatively arbitrary and using it as a ‘scientific’ guide can be misleading and confusing. As Murthy noted, we must reassess these definition ‘cut-offs.’ 

What are some of the limits of what we know? 

While the current research overwhelmingly shows a link between alcohol consumption and cancer, the details of what we do not know also matter. The evidence suggests that cancer risk is directly proportional to the amount of alcohol consumed, meaning that if you drink more alcohol, your risk of cancer increases. This makes sense – alcohol is a toxin and the more toxins you put in your body, the worse it should be for you. 

But is it only the quantity that matters? Does the risk differ by alcohol ‘quality’ (for example, a natural wine or high-quality wine versus one with more additives) or type of alcohol? Is there a ‘safe’ limit? What role does genetics play? Do other preventative measures, such as healthy, clean eating and exercise, ‘offset’ your cancer risk from alcohol use, and – if so – by how much?   

These questions highlight only some of what we do not know, and it is important to note that they do not discredit the central fact – alcohol and cancer are directly linked. But what it does show is that there is more research to be done, especially to reduce some of the bias, or confounders, in the current data used to date. This makes sure the most complete evidence is available to guide education and policy making.

From a 30,000-foot view, alcohol damages your DNA, which increases your cancer risk. 

So, what does all of this mean for you? 

We should commend Murthy for bringing this information into the national spotlight. Information is empowering, and now – after reading this piece – I’m confident you can make a more knowledgeable decision for yourself about how much and how often to drink alcohol. 

From my perspective, I strongly believe that moderation is key, and I will continue to stress this as a physician and follow this approach in my own life. While many may stop drinking alcohol altogether after this advisory was published, I urge all others to strive to moderate their intake.  

Personally, I will still enjoy a social beer here or a glass of wine there. At the same time, however, I plan to decrease my alcohol consumption overall. It’s an individual decision, and as a cancer survivor (testicular cancer) myself, I still want to ‘live my life’. 

Ultimately, I challenge all of us to take a step each day to be a bit healthier – eat better, drink less, work out more and support our mental and spiritual health and well-being. 

The opinions, thoughts, and ideas expressed in this article are those of the author only and not necessarily those of any employers or institutions of which he is affiliated.

Related Topics

Opinion
Health
Cancer
Spirits
Executive

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS
0 comment
0
FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

previous post
Biden admin slammed for ‘waiting’ to declare genocide in Sudan
next post
Trump reportedly plans to unleash around 100 executive orders after taking office

related articles

Trump administration wins Supreme Court fight to slash...

August 22, 2025

Zelenskyy seeks ‘strong reaction’ from US if Putin...

August 22, 2025

Pentagon unveils new medal for troops deployed in...

August 21, 2025

Federal judge rules Trump appointee Alina Habba is...

August 21, 2025

‘Maine’s Mamdani’: Maine GOP chief issues warning about...

August 21, 2025

‘There are 50 swamps’: State Freedom Caucus Network...

August 21, 2025

Trump-aligned legal group probes Biden-era organ transplant program...

August 21, 2025

NATO defense chiefs stress commitment to Ukraine, discuss...

August 21, 2025

Russian drone crashes in Polish field; Warsaw protests...

August 21, 2025

Gabbard launches ‘ODNI 2.0,’ with plan to cut...

August 20, 2025
Enter Your Information Below To Receive Free Trading Ideas, Latest News, And Articles.


Your information is secure and your privacy is protected. By opting in you agree to receive emails from us. Remember that you can opt-out any time, we hate spam too!

Latest News

  • What was in the brown bags handed to Israeli hostages released by Hamas?

    January 21, 2025
  • Korean Air shows full confidence in Boeing with 40-plane order despite recent challenges

    July 22, 2024
  • SafeMoon and Litecoin: Litecoin continues to move bullish

    September 5, 2024
  • Bernie Sanders compares Trump, Musk and other ‘oligarchs’ to ‘heroin addicts,’ says drug of choice is ‘greed’

    April 15, 2025
  • Watchdog group sues for NASA emails with ‘Space Czar’ Harris, Boeing as astronauts linger in orbit

    September 17, 2024

Popular Posts

  • 1

    Secret Service admits leaning on ‘state and local partners’ after claim it ignored Trump team’s past requests

    July 21, 2024
  • 2

    Five more House Democrats call on Biden to drop out, third US senator

    July 19, 2024
  • 3

    Elon and Vivek should tackle US funding for this boondoogle organization and score a multimillion dollar win

    December 4, 2024
  • 4

    Forex Profit Calculator: Maximize Your Trading Potential

    July 10, 2024
  • 5

    Biden calls to ‘lower the temperature’ then bashes Trump in NAACP speech

    July 17, 2024

Categories

  • Economy (829)
  • Editor's Pick (5,783)
  • Investing (634)
  • Stock (893)

Latest Posts

  • Former VP Harris reportedly asking Hillary Clinton for advice on what to do after losing to Trump

    January 23, 2025
  • Biden’s former spokesman slams Trump and GOP for ‘colluding to impeach’ judges

    March 20, 2025
  • BLDP Stock Key Metrics, Price Forecast – Is It a Buy?

    October 3, 2024

Recent Posts

  • The great airlift: how Apple ferried 1.5M iPhones from India to the US to beat Trump tariffs

    April 10, 2025
  • Walmart says it’s ‘not going to be completely immune’ from Trump’s tariffs

    February 20, 2025
  • Two men convicted in Pennsylvania mayoral race election fraud case hit with harsher sentences than expected

    June 19, 2025

Editor’s Pick

  • Trump’s aluminum tariffs may force Coca-Cola to use more plastic bottles

    February 12, 2025
  • Fired NLRB commissioner asks federal judge for reinstatement

    March 5, 2025
  • Federal judge rules Trump’s firing of head of special counsel was unlawful, will maintain his job

    March 2, 2025
  • About us
  • Contacts
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions

Disclaimer: moneyrisetoday.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

Copyright © 2025 moneyrisetoday.com | All Rights Reserved

Money Rise Today – Investing and Stock News
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
Money Rise Today – Investing and Stock News
  • Investing
  • Stock