• Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
Money Rise Today – Investing and Stock News
  • Investing
  • Stock
Editor's Pick

House Democrats demand answers on DOJ’s move to fire former special counsel officials

by January 29, 2025
written by January 29, 2025

House Democrats are demanding answers regarding the Justice Department’s move this week to fire more than a dozen officials involved in former Special Counsel Jack Smith’s investigation, arguing the action was in ‘complete contradiction’ of President Trump’s effort to keep a ‘merit-based system’ for government employees. 

House Judiciary Committee Ranking Member Jamie Raskin, D-Md., and House Oversight Committee Ranking Member Gerald Connolly, D-Ma., penned a letter to acting Attorney General James McHenry Tuesday, obtained by Fox News. 

‘We write to you with alarm and profound concern about reports of the administration engaging in the widespread summary firing and involuntary reassignment of excellent career prosecutors and federal agents throughout the Department of Justice (DOJ),’ they wrote. ‘This onslaught against effective DOJ civil servants began within hours of President Donald Trump’s inauguration, in complete contradiction of the president’s repeated pledges to maintain a merit-based system for government employment.’ 

Raskin and Connolly added that the officials worked ‘strenuously to defend the rule of law have been removed from their positions without any evaluation—much less any negative evaluation—of their work.’ 

McHenry, on Monday, fired more than a dozen key officials on Smith’s team who worked to prosecute the president, saying that they could not be trusted in ‘faithfully implementing the president’s agenda.’ 

Fox News Digital first reported the news exclusively on Monday. 

Raskin and Connolly argued that the officials terminated on Monday were ‘part of an expert, non-political workforce tasked with protecting our national security and public safety.’ 

‘They have been hired and promoted based on their professional merit and excellence,’ they wrote, adding that ‘many of them have decades of experience under their belt and have served under, been promoted by, and received awards from presidential administrations of both major political parties, including President Trump’s first administration.’ 

The Democrats argued that McHenry removed them from their posts ‘without regard to their demonstrated competencies, their recognized achievements, or their devoted service to the Department, in some cases reassigning them to areas that are outside of their legal expertise.’ 

‘By removing them from their positions in this hasty and unprincipled way, you have very likely violated longstanding federal laws,’ they wrote, also accusing McHenry of having ‘taken aim at law students who applied to, interviewed for, and received offers from the Department based on their demonstrated academic achievements and their commitment to public service.’ 

The Democrats claimed that the DOJ ‘rescinded job offers to summer interns and entry-level attorneys hired through the Attorney General’s Honors Program, a highly competitive 72-year-old recruitment program that receives applications from students at hundreds of law schools across the country.’

‘We have also received disturbing reports surfacing that White House staff are playing a substantial role in these employment decisions and examining career civil servants’ LinkedIn and other social media profiles to ascertain their personal political leanings,’ Raskin and Connolly wrote. ‘Taken together, your actions raise significant concern that you are determined to fill the ranks of the DOJ and FBI with career employees selected for the personal loyalty or political services they have rendered to President Trump.’ 

Raskin and Connolly are demanding the DOJ provide them with a list of names of officials who have been reassigned or terminated; and provide any communications between the DOJ and the White House since Inauguration Day regarding the content of personal social media accounts of career DOJ employees or applicants. 

Raskin and Connolly demanded the information by Feb. 11 at 5:00 p.m. 

Their letter comes after McHenry, on Monday, transmitted a letter to each official notifying them of their termination, a Justice Department official exclusively told Fox News Digital. It is unclear how many officials received that letter. The names of the individuals were not immediately released. 

‘Acting Attorney General James McHenry terminated the employment of a number of DOJ officials who played a significant role in prosecuting President Trump,’ a DOJ official told Fox News Digital. ‘In light of their actions, the Acting Attorney General does not trust these officials to assist in faithfully implementing the President’s agenda.’ 

This action ‘is consistent with the mission of ending the weaponization of government,’ the official told Fox News Digital.

The Justice Department did not immediately respond to Fox News Digital’s request for comment. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS
0 comment
0
FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

previous post
Quantum Computing Investments: Opportunities & Risks
next post
DAVID MARCUS: GOP owes RFK Jr. big time, and the debt is due

related articles

As Trump urges deal, Cuban president warns that...

January 12, 2026

I was told I was a boy. Supreme...

January 12, 2026

Rand Paul says Trump’s threat to bomb Iran...

January 12, 2026

Iran’s collapse or survival hinges on one choice...

January 12, 2026

Expert warns of ‘extreme violence’ in Venezuelan mining...

January 12, 2026

US used sonic weapon on Venezuelan troops, report...

January 11, 2026

Federal judge blocks Trump administration from enforcing mail-in...

January 11, 2026

Trump responds to post suggesting Rubio as president...

January 11, 2026

Netanyahu and Rubio discuss US military intervention in...

January 11, 2026

Protester scales Iranian Embassy in London, tears down...

January 11, 2026
Enter Your Information Below To Receive Free Trading Ideas, Latest News, And Articles.


Your information is secure and your privacy is protected. By opting in you agree to receive emails from us. Remember that you can opt-out any time, we hate spam too!

Latest News

  • Trump’s ‘big, beautiful’ tax agenda scores major victory in House despite GOP rebellion threats

    April 10, 2025
  • How the White House turkey pardon became an American tradition

    November 27, 2025
  • Harris once boasted of ‘behind the scenes’ work to get ‘every’ trans inmate access to gender surgeries

    September 12, 2024
  • Supreme Court blocks lower court order forcing Trump administration to fully fund SNAP program

    November 8, 2025
  • Dem, GOP insiders both see major opportunity after Biden’s first solo presser in months

    July 13, 2024

Popular Posts

  • 1

    Secret Service admits leaning on ‘state and local partners’ after claim it ignored Trump team’s past requests

    July 21, 2024
  • 2

    District judges’ orders blocking Trump agenda face hearing in top Senate committee

    April 2, 2025
  • 3

    Five more House Democrats call on Biden to drop out, third US senator

    July 19, 2024
  • 4

    Forex Profit Calculator: Maximize Your Trading Potential

    July 10, 2024
  • 5

    Elon and Vivek should tackle US funding for this boondoogle organization and score a multimillion dollar win

    December 4, 2024

Categories

  • Economy (829)
  • Editor's Pick (7,410)
  • Investing (814)
  • Stock (965)

Latest Posts

  • House Republicans clear path for Trump to act on tariff plans

    January 24, 2025
  • Netanyahu reportedly upset with Harris over VP’s Israel remarks as White House pushes back

    July 26, 2024
  • Mamdani breaks silence on freed Israeli hostages in statement that doesn’t mention Trump

    October 13, 2025

Recent Posts

  • Trump softens Gaza stance, says Palestinians will not be expelled from the war-torn territory

    March 13, 2025
  • Biden defends controversial autopen use for mass clemency decisions in NYT interview: ‘A whole lot of people’

    July 14, 2025
  • China warns US to stop arming Taiwan after Biden approves $571M in military aid

    December 23, 2024

Editor’s Pick

  • TAMMY BRUCE: An open letter to the Kennedys who turned on RFK Jr

    August 25, 2024
  • European stocks wrap volatile week mixed: FTSE 100 inches higher, DAX dips

    April 11, 2025
  • DAVID MARCUS: De facto President Trump’s handling of shutdown threat was a masterclass

    December 21, 2024
  • About us
  • Contacts
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions

Disclaimer: moneyrisetoday.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

Copyright © 2025 moneyrisetoday.com | All Rights Reserved

Money Rise Today – Investing and Stock News
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
Money Rise Today – Investing and Stock News
  • Investing
  • Stock