• Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
Money Rise Today – Investing and Stock News
  • Investing
  • Stock
Editor's Pick

FBI, DOJ strike agreement in lawsuit over January 6 agent list amid fears of retaliation

by February 7, 2025
written by February 7, 2025

The Justice Department and a group of FBI agents reached an agreement in federal court Friday over the dissemination of information about FBI agents involved in the Jan. 6 investigation.

According to the text of the deal, the Trump administration cannot release information about the FBI agents who investigated the January 6, 2021, U.S. Capitol riot without giving plaintiffs at least two days’ notice so that the matter can be considered again in federal court.

It does not, however, place such a time limit on the dissemination of agents’ identities to other government agencies or the White House. 

The deal resolves, at least for now, a dispute over the release of information that agents said they feared could be used for retaliation or leaked to the public.

 

The agreement comes after active FBI agents and the Federal Bureau of Investigation Agents Association, a voluntary agents’ group, sued the Justice Department earlier this week seeking to block the release of any identifying information about FBI agents involved in the January 6 investigations.

The two parties tussled for hours in court on Thursday in front of U.S. District Judge Jia Cobb, who questioned both parties at length on the nature of DOJ’s questionnaire, the potential for disclosures or retaliation and how the Justice Department intends to use information divulged in the questionnaires.

The agreement defers any immediate relief for plaintiffs, pushing to March 27 their hearing for a preliminary injunction. 

Cobb previously granted the two parties a brief administrative stay on Thursday evening, saying that if the information was released she believed it ‘would put FBI agents in immediate danger.’

The agreement comes just days after FBI leadership said it had provided the Justice Department with a list of agents who worked on Jan. 6 investigations and criminal cases, in keeping with an earlier deadline set by U.S. Acting Deputy Attorney General Emil Bove.

‘Plaintiffs assert that the purpose for this list is to identify agents to be terminated or to suffer other adverse employment action,’ lawyers for the FBI agents said, adding that they ‘reasonably fear that all or parts of this list might be published by allies of President Trump, thus placing themselves and their families in immediate danger of retribution by the now pardoned and at-large Jan. 6 convicted felons.’

Lawyers for the agents argued that any effort to review or discriminate against agents involved in the investigation would be ‘unlawful and retaliatory,’ and a violation of civil service protections under federal law.

They also cited ‘profound concern’ that the list of thousands of FBI agents involved would be leaked to the public, threatening their safety. 

Meanwhile, lawyers for the Justice Department stressed that their intent in issuing the questionnaire was to conduct an ‘internal review’ of activities in the Jan. 6 probe, not to punish individuals for carrying out orders. 

Bove also sought to emphasize this message in an all-staff email to FBI personnel earlier this week. In the email, Bove stressed that the questionnaire was not intended to be a first step to mass layoffs, and stressed it was simply intended for review.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS
0 comment
0
FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

previous post
Deadline looms for release of JFK assassination files
next post
Trump plans to meet with Zelenskyy as he looks to end Ukraine war

related articles

EPA scraps Biden coal restrictions as advocates say...

February 21, 2026

RFK Jr defends Trump move to protect pesticide...

February 20, 2026

US to unveil platform aiming to bypass internet...

February 20, 2026

Trump announces 10% global tariff, criticizes Supreme Court...

February 20, 2026

Supreme Court kills Trump’s ‘Liberation Day’ tariffs —...

February 20, 2026

Trump responds to Supreme Court ruling rejecting sweeping...

February 20, 2026

‘Tariffs suck’: Some Republicans privately celebrate as Supreme...

February 20, 2026

Republicans shred ‘nonsense’ Dem claims against Trump-backed voter...

February 20, 2026

Trump says he is ‘considering’ a limited military...

February 20, 2026

The only map you need to see to...

February 20, 2026
Enter Your Information Below To Receive Free Trading Ideas, Latest News, And Articles.


Your information is secure and your privacy is protected. By opting in you agree to receive emails from us. Remember that you can opt-out any time, we hate spam too!

Latest News

  • Trump’s most vulnerable nominees RFK Jr, Tulsi Gabbard get back-to-back hearings

    January 27, 2025
  • EXCLUSIVE: Charlie Kirk’s final book battles the ‘machine of modern life,’ urges a return to the Sabbath

    December 4, 2025
  • Trump administration ends program to track kidnapped Ukrainian children in Russia, lawmakers say

    March 19, 2025
  • American Airlines flight attendants ratify new contract with immediate raises topping 20%

    September 13, 2024
  • Senate GOP ready to go nuclear after Schumer’s ‘political extortion’ of nominees

    August 5, 2025

Popular Posts

  • 1

    District judges’ orders blocking Trump agenda face hearing in top Senate committee

    April 2, 2025
  • 2

    Secret Service admits leaning on ‘state and local partners’ after claim it ignored Trump team’s past requests

    July 21, 2024
  • 3

    Five more House Democrats call on Biden to drop out, third US senator

    July 19, 2024
  • 4

    Forex Profit Calculator: Maximize Your Trading Potential

    July 10, 2024
  • 5

    Elon and Vivek should tackle US funding for this boondoogle organization and score a multimillion dollar win

    December 4, 2024

Categories

  • Economy (829)
  • Editor's Pick (8,015)
  • Investing (1,019)
  • Stock (978)

Latest Posts

  • DAVID MARCUS: Trump’s Canada tariffs take toll on would-be Conservative Prime Minister Pierre Poilievre

    March 10, 2025
  • Apple stock: why JPM switch is strategically sound but financially modest

    January 9, 2026
  • Elon Musk quietly donates ‘very substantial’ amount to PAC to canvass Hispanic voters

    October 22, 2024

Recent Posts

  • GOP senators push Kamala Harris testimony as House Oversight eyes subpoena

    August 23, 2025
  • Senate Republicans call on DOJ to appoint special counsel in Obama-Russia investigation

    July 24, 2025
  • ‘Just like Trump’: ISIS murder victim Kayla Mueller’s parents endorse Patel for FBI following military op role

    January 28, 2025

Editor’s Pick

  • Trump-Kennedy Center blasts ‘far-left bias’ in ratings coverage, points to No. 1 demographics tie

    January 8, 2026
  • Bitcoin Hits $88,000 All-Time High, Ethereum Surges 5.91%

    November 15, 2024
  • Lawmakers react to stopgap funding and averting government shutdown

    December 21, 2024
  • About us
  • Contacts
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions

Disclaimer: moneyrisetoday.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

Copyright © 2025 moneyrisetoday.com | All Rights Reserved

Money Rise Today – Investing and Stock News
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
Money Rise Today – Investing and Stock News
  • Investing
  • Stock