• Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
Money Rise Today – Investing and Stock News
  • Investing
  • Stock
Editor's Pick

Can Congress defund federal courts with key Trump budget process?

by March 25, 2025
written by March 25, 2025

As Republicans look for ways to rein in federal judges issuing countless orders to halt the Trump administration’s action on immigration in particular, a number of potential avenues for doing so are being considered. 

However, the use of a key budget process that lowers the Senate’s threshold to 51 votes to defund certain courts could face significant obstacles.

Rep. Chip Roy, R-Texas, House Freedom Caucus policy chair and chair of the House Judiciary Committee’s subcommittee on the Constitution, told Fox News Digital he isn’t ‘for or against’ any specific approach to addressing the countrywide injunctions that are throwing a wrench into President Donald Trump’s priorities.

‘We ought to look at [impeachment], we ought to look at jurisdiction-stripping, we ought to look at every option that needs to be addressed about judges that are actively taking steps to try to undermine the presidency,’ he said.

The Republican added, ‘I think there are pros and cons of those approaches. I think we need to look at … funding scenarios. Now that takes a little time; you’ve got to work through either the appropriations, rescissions or reconciliation process, depending on where it’s appropriate.’

The budget reconciliation process lowers the threshold for Senate passage from 60 votes to 51 out of 100, allowing the party in power to more easily advance its agenda with no opposition party support. However, the provisions must relate to budgetary and other fiscal matters. The House of Representatives already has a simple majority threshold.

The process is being relied on heavily by Republicans, who have a trifecta in Washington, in order to push through Trump agenda items.

In the months since Trump took office, his aggressive pace has been somewhat hampered by federal judges across the country issuing numerous orders to halt immigration, waste-cutting and anti-diversity, equity and inclusion actions. 

This has prompted Republicans to call for action against what they consider abusive actions by lower-tier federal judges.  

‘I don’t think defunding is a viable option,’ said Andy McCarthy, a former assistant U.S. attorney and a Fox News contributor. 

‘The chief justice would be angry that the district courts were understaffed, and Trump wouldn’t get away with later trying to add the positions back so that he could fill them,’ he continued.

Former Deputy Assistant Attorney General John Yoo called potentially defunding the courts that have been causing problems for the administration ‘a terrible idea.’

‘It would make no difference anyway; the cases challenging Trump’s executive orders would still be challenged in the courts that exist,’ he explained. 

This was echoed by former Trump attorney Jim Trusty, who said, ‘I don’t think defunding an already overworked judicial system would be right or effective.’

Because of the specific guidelines for what can be included in reconciliation bills, legal experts seem to be in agreement that defunding courts wouldn’t meet the requirements. 

One such expert told Fox News Digital that not only does the provision need to have a federal fiscal impact, the policy effect cannot outweigh that impact. 

They further noted that the Senate’s parliamentarian would be the one to make a judgment on this. 

Trusty said ‘the solution to judicial activism’ is either the appellate courts finding ways to stop the injunctions on appeal or by direct orders, or ‘Congress develops a nimble response and passes legislation to clarify their intent to let the executive branch act without judicial tethers on various issues.’

‘The better option would be to explore ways to limit the jurisdiction of the lower courts or to fast-track appeals when they try to issue nationwide injunctions,’ McCarthy said.

As for potentially impeaching federal judges, which has been floated by Trump himself, Trusty said it ‘should still be viewed as a prosecution substitute for office holders who have committed treason or high crimes and misdemeanors; in other words, serious crimes.’

‘Bad judgment and wrong-headed decisions are not crimes,’ he noted. 

Neither Trump’s White House nor Republican leadership in Congress have indicated plans to pursue the issue through the reconciliation process.

Lawmakers have acknowledged the problem, though, and the House is set to take up legislation to address the judges’ actions next week.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS
0 comment
0
FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

previous post
Bitcoin is just another tech stock, not a market hedge, study shows
next post
No signal, no problem: Intelligence firm debuts drone tech equipped to beat GPS jammers

related articles

Trump DOJ to begin handing over Epstein files...

August 22, 2025

TikTok isn’t enough to stop Gen Z from...

August 22, 2025

Trump administration wins Supreme Court fight to slash...

August 22, 2025

Zelenskyy seeks ‘strong reaction’ from US if Putin...

August 22, 2025

Pentagon unveils new medal for troops deployed in...

August 21, 2025

Federal judge rules Trump appointee Alina Habba is...

August 21, 2025

‘Maine’s Mamdani’: Maine GOP chief issues warning about...

August 21, 2025

‘There are 50 swamps’: State Freedom Caucus Network...

August 21, 2025

Trump-aligned legal group probes Biden-era organ transplant program...

August 21, 2025

NATO defense chiefs stress commitment to Ukraine, discuss...

August 21, 2025
Enter Your Information Below To Receive Free Trading Ideas, Latest News, And Articles.


Your information is secure and your privacy is protected. By opting in you agree to receive emails from us. Remember that you can opt-out any time, we hate spam too!

Latest News

  • Amazon’s $4 billion investment in AI firm Anthropic faces U.K. merger investigation

    August 9, 2024
  • JD Vance to tail Kamala Harris and her running mate this week on campaign trail

    August 5, 2024
  • The 10 worst states to retire in the U.S. No. 1 isn’t California or New York

    July 31, 2024
  • Judge blocks Trump admin from firing federal probationary workers

    April 2, 2025
  • Uniqlo operator sees Q1 profit rise amid sluggish China performance

    January 9, 2025

Popular Posts

  • 1

    Secret Service admits leaning on ‘state and local partners’ after claim it ignored Trump team’s past requests

    July 21, 2024
  • 2

    Five more House Democrats call on Biden to drop out, third US senator

    July 19, 2024
  • 3

    Elon and Vivek should tackle US funding for this boondoogle organization and score a multimillion dollar win

    December 4, 2024
  • 4

    Forex Profit Calculator: Maximize Your Trading Potential

    July 10, 2024
  • 5

    Biden calls to ‘lower the temperature’ then bashes Trump in NAACP speech

    July 17, 2024

Categories

  • Economy (829)
  • Editor's Pick (5,785)
  • Investing (634)
  • Stock (893)

Latest Posts

  • House Democrat clashes with activists over Israel ‘genocide’ as pro-Palestinian protests derail town hall

    August 20, 2025
  • Truth Social app on the Nasdaq as DJT, closed 16% higher

    November 19, 2024
  • USDCAD and USDCNH: USDCAD erased last week’s losses

    September 3, 2024

Recent Posts

  • Trump order targeting law firm WilmerHale blocked as ‘unconstitutional,’ federal judge rules

    May 28, 2025
  • US accuses Denmark of treating Greenlanders as ‘second-class citizens’ during Vance visit to Arctic base

    March 28, 2025
  • Special counsel Jack Smith resigns after 2-year stint at Department of Justice

    January 12, 2025

Editor’s Pick

  • Dogecoin and Litecoin: Doge above EMA 200 remains bullish

    September 11, 2024
  • PepeX ICO raises $1.35M as Trump’s crypto push fuels market attention

    April 14, 2025
  • Trump tariffs? No problem, says Rolls-Royce CEO

    January 9, 2025
  • About us
  • Contacts
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions

Disclaimer: moneyrisetoday.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

Copyright © 2025 moneyrisetoday.com | All Rights Reserved

Money Rise Today – Investing and Stock News
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
Money Rise Today – Investing and Stock News
  • Investing
  • Stock