• Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
Money Rise Today – Investing and Stock News
  • Investing
  • Stock
Editor's Pick

DAVID MARCUS: Sorry Dems, literally nobody believes married women can’t get IDs

by April 12, 2025
written by April 12, 2025
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

The latest ridiculous lie from Democrats about how Republicans are driving the country towards fascism is out, and it is a doozy. This time, we are meant to believe that Trump and the GOP are banning married women from voting.

Spoiler Alert: They aren’t.

Rep. Eric Swalwell, D-Calif., and others took to video this week to make the nonsensical and logically tortured claim, saying, ‘House Republicans’ so-called ‘SAVE Act’ blocks nearly 70 million women from registering to vote—just because they changed their name after marriage.’

Here is what failed glass-ceiling breaker Hillary Clinton had to say: ‘The House just passed the Republican voter suppression measure that threatens voting access for millions of Americans, including 69 million women whose married names don’t match their birth certificates.’

The Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act requires prrof of citizenship to cast a vote in federal elections. Among the acceptable documents for demonstrating proof of citizenship are: A REAL ID-compliant driver’s license, a valid U.S. passport, and a military ID.

You would think the driver’s license requirement would be simple enough, but then again, blue-state Democrats screwed that up when they insisted on giving driver’s licenses to illegal immigrants whose supporting documents could not be verified. Now, the rest of us have to get extra verification for our driver’s licenses so they can be distinguished from the ones handed out like candy to illegal aliens.

So now, Democrats are seriously suggesting that married women in our country are all but incapable of obtaining verified identification and therefore will be disenfranchised by Republicans, presumably while they twist their handlebar mustaches and kick some puppies.

I’d like to ask Rep. Swalwell, if married women are incapable of getting IDs such as a driver’s license, then why is there an almost endless line of them in cars in front of me at the school pick-up line?

Furthermore, I am given to understand that married women quite regularly travel abroad. If they can’t get a passport, then how is this happening? Are their husbands bribing border officials?

… there are approximately 70 million married women in the United States who may have taken their spouse’s last name, which means there are 70 million Americans who know damn well how easily they can obtain valid ID.

If, in fact, there is some intractable issue preventing married women from getting ID, then we should fix it. But given that nobody had ever heard of this ‘major problem’ until Republicans brought up a voter ID law, it is, well, suspicious.

This is especially true, given that up to 80% of Americans support showing valid ID to vote, yet instead of honoring the will of the people, the left, once again, goes charging towards facile identity politics.

You have to hand it to the Democrats. When they latch onto a message, they immediately start yelling it in unison with all the subtlety of a sky-writing competition, like last month, when they all started cursing like Andrew Dice Clay one day.

As cosmically stupid and demonstrably false as it is, this claim that married women will be disparately impacted, or uniquely disadvantaged by the voter ID law is par for a very dangerous course that the Democrats run over and over.

According to the Democrats, we can’t have safer streets because minorities or the poor will be arrested more often, we can’t protect women in sports because that violates trans rights and now we can’t secure the vote because married women don’t know how to get IDs.

This is all ‘disparate impact ad absurdum.’ if there is one non-white, non-straight, non-cis person in America who faces a negative consequence from legislation, then the whole thing has to be tanked. 

Meanwhile, Democrats push policies like student debt relief that clearly disadvantages Americans who never went to college, but in this case somehow the discrimination is enlightened.

The final nail in the coffin of this insane notion that the GOP wants to disenfranchise everyone with ‘Mrs.’ in front of her name, or in Democrats opinion, his or her name, is that married women lean Republican in their voting.

In fact, recent polling has shown that with full voter participation, the Republicans and Trump would have won by even more in 2024, so why on earth would the GOP want to leave those votes on the table?

Ultimately, what the Democrats have here is a reality problem. As Swalwell pointed out, there are approximately 70 million married women in the United States who may have taken their spouse’s last name, which means there are 70 million Americans who know damn well how easily they can obtain valid ID.

So get out there and vote, married ladies. There is literally nothing stopping you.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS
0 comment
0
FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

previous post
Here’s what happened during Trump’s 12th week in office
next post
With Trump’s backing Israel pushes deeper into Gaza as pressure builds for hostage deal

related articles

Trump talks with Putin, spars with South African...

May 24, 2025

DAVID MARCUS: Tax-free overtime could be midterm magic...

May 24, 2025

SCOOP: House Republicans request ban on federally funded...

May 24, 2025

WATCH: GOP senators rail against staggering $4.7 trillion...

May 24, 2025

Trump unleashes US nuclear renaissance with bold executive...

May 24, 2025

Trump admin steps up overhaul of National Security...

May 24, 2025

Satellite images reveal North Korea’s mangled naval destroyer...

May 24, 2025

Trump administration plans to overhaul National Security Council,...

May 24, 2025

Trump signs executive orders bolstering nuclear industry, domestic...

May 23, 2025

Hundreds of Ukrainian prisoners released in swap with...

May 23, 2025
Enter Your Information Below To Receive Free Trading Ideas, Latest News, And Articles.


Your information is secure and your privacy is protected. By opting in you agree to receive emails from us. Remember that you can opt-out any time, we hate spam too!

Latest News

  • Lori Chavez-DeRemer: The little-known Trump nominee who may need to rely on Dems to cross finish line

    February 11, 2025
  • HHS SEC ROBERT F KENNEDY JR: American patients pay more so others can pay less — that stops now

    May 17, 2025
  • AI Stocks Decline Amid DeepSeek’s Emerging AI Model

    January 28, 2025
  • Harris VP pick spent years promoting research facility that collaborated with ‘Chinese military company’

    August 29, 2024
  • Trump says ‘there’s something wrong’ with top Democrat he’s known ‘a long time’

    May 14, 2025

Popular Posts

  • 1

    Secret Service admits leaning on ‘state and local partners’ after claim it ignored Trump team’s past requests

    July 21, 2024
  • 2

    Elon and Vivek should tackle US funding for this boondoogle organization and score a multimillion dollar win

    December 4, 2024
  • 3

    Forex Profit Calculator: Maximize Your Trading Potential

    July 10, 2024
  • 4

    Five more House Democrats call on Biden to drop out, third US senator

    July 19, 2024
  • 5

    Biden calls to ‘lower the temperature’ then bashes Trump in NAACP speech

    July 17, 2024

Categories

  • Economy (829)
  • Editor's Pick (4,655)
  • Investing (624)
  • Stock (766)

Latest Posts

  • Jan. 6 committee member says pardons are unnecessary: ‘We didn’t do anything wrong’

    January 16, 2025
  • Trump makes it official, announces North Dakota Gov. Doug Burgum as Department of the Interior secretary

    November 15, 2024
  • How investors can prepare for lower interest rates: It’s ‘like getting a haircut,’ advisor says

    August 24, 2024

Recent Posts

  • Ford Stock: Is it a Good Sell or Buy?

    July 26, 2024
  • Vance issues ultimatum to Russia, Ukraine on peace negotiations

    April 23, 2025
  • Trump to sign executive order instructing agencies to hunt down regulations that violate Constitution

    February 20, 2025

Editor’s Pick

  • Dow closes nearly 500 points lower Thursday as investors’ recession fears awaken

    August 2, 2024
  • Musk spars with White House trade advisor Peter Navarro: ‘Dumber than a sack of bricks’

    April 8, 2025
  • Trump pledges universal coverage for IVF treatment ‘because we want more babies’

    August 30, 2024
  • About us
  • Contacts
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions

Disclaimer: moneyrisetoday.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

Copyright © 2025 moneyrisetoday.com | All Rights Reserved

Money Rise Today – Investing and Stock News
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
Money Rise Today – Investing and Stock News
  • Investing
  • Stock