• Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
Money Rise Today – Investing and Stock News
  • Investing
  • Stock
Editor's Pick

Parents tell SCOTUS: LGBTQ storybooks in classrooms clash with our faith

by April 22, 2025
written by April 22, 2025

The Supreme Court heard arguments on Tuesday from religious parents who say young children can’t be expected to separate a teacher’s moral messages from their family’s beliefs – raising the question of whether exposure to LGBTQ-themed storybooks in elementary classrooms constitutes ‘coercion.’

Eric S. Baxter, the attorney representing Maryland parents in Mahmoud v. Taylor, told the justices that Montgomery County Public Schools violated the First Amendment by denying opt-out requests for books that ‘contradict their religious beliefs,’ even while allowing exemptions for other religious objections – such as books depicting the Muslim Prophet Muhammad.

‘There’s no basis for denying opt-outs for religious reasons,’ Baxter said during oral arguments. ‘Parents, not school boards, should have the final say on such religious matters.’

Justice Clarence Thomas asked Baxter about whether children were merely ‘exposed’ to the books or actively instructed by them. 

‘Are the books just there and no more, or are they actually being taught out of the books?’ he asked.

Baxter said teachers were required to use the materials in class. ‘When the books were first introduced in August of 2022, the board suggested they be used five times before the end of the year. One of the schools, Sherwood School, in June for Pride Month said that they were going to read one book each day.’

Parents, supported by religious freedom organizations, argue that this policy infringes upon their First Amendment rights by compelling their children to engage in instruction that contradicts their religious beliefs. The Fourth Circuit Court, a federal appeals court, ruled last year that there was no violation of religious exercise rights, stating that the policy did not force parents to change their religious beliefs or conduct and that parents could still teach their children outside of school.

Justice Sonia Sotomayor asked Baxter whether exposure to same-sex relationships in children’s books could be considered religious coercion. 

‘Is looking at two men getting married… is that the religious objection?’ she asked, referencing the book, ‘Uncle Bobby’s Wedding.’ ‘The most they’re doing is holding hands.’

Baxter maintained that it depends on the family’s faith. ‘Our parents would object to that,’ he said. ‘Their faith teaches… they shouldn’t be exposed to information about sex during their years of innocence without being accompanied by moral principles.’

Justice Samuel Alito inquired about the developmental capacity of young children as young as 4 to question classroom teachings and moral instruction.

‘Would you agree that there comes a point when a student is able to make that distinction?’ he asked. ‘That my teacher… isn’t necessarily going to be correct on everything. It is possible for me to disagree with him or her on certain subjects?’

Baxter agreed.

‘That’s right,’ he said. ‘And many of our clients’ objections would be diminished as their children got older.’

But Baxter stood strong on the point that age matters, especially in this case. He argued even Montgomery County school officials had acknowledged some books were not age-appropriate and criticized their attitude toward religious perspectives.

‘In a situation where Montgomery County’s own principals objected that these books were inappropriate for the age, they were dismissive of religion and shaming toward children who disagree,’ Baxter said. ‘The board itself withdrew two of the books for what it said were content concerns, because it finally agreed that what parents and petitioners – and its own principals – are saying was accurate.’

Mahmoud v. Taylor is one of three major religious cases the Supreme Court has on the docket for this year.  

Earlier this month, the high court heard a case brought by a Wisconsin-based Catholic charity group’s bid for tax relief, which could alter the current eligibility requirements for religious tax exemptions. 

At issue in that case is whether the Wisconsin branch of Catholic Charities, a social services organization affiliated with Catholic dioceses across the country, can successfully contest the state’s high court determination that it is ineligible for a religious tax exemption because it is not ‘operated primarily for religious purposes.’

The third case is about whether a Catholic online school can become the first religious charter school in the U.S. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS
0 comment
0
FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

previous post
Iran ramps up state executions amid nuclear talks with US
next post
Tesla stock surges 4% ahead of Q1 earnings: what to expect

related articles

Hawley blasts FDA approval of new abortion drug,...

October 2, 2025

Trump’s DOGE savings dwarfed by Medicare, Social Security...

October 2, 2025

FLASHBACK: James Comey urged officials to always prosecute...

October 2, 2025

The agency staff Vought might recommend cutting and...

October 2, 2025

Reagan-appointed judge, once rebuked by Supreme Court, continues...

October 2, 2025

‘Real consequences’: Food aid, flood insurance, FEMA funds...

October 2, 2025

Trump must triple severely outdated nuke arsenal to...

October 2, 2025

White House says federal layoffs could hit ‘thousands’...

October 2, 2025

Johnson shuts door on negotiating shutdown deal as...

October 2, 2025

Democrats refuse to budge over Obamacare fight as...

October 2, 2025
Enter Your Information Below To Receive Free Trading Ideas, Latest News, And Articles.


Your information is secure and your privacy is protected. By opting in you agree to receive emails from us. Remember that you can opt-out any time, we hate spam too!

Latest News

  • Cracker Barrel will go back to old logo after conservative backlash

    August 27, 2025
  • Federal appeals court upholds $83.3M E. Jean Carroll judgment against Trump

    September 8, 2025
  • Rubio tells House Dem ‘this is not a game show’ during heated hearing

    May 21, 2025
  • Who is Pierre Poilievre? Canada’s Conservative leader seeking to become next prime minister after Trudeau exit

    January 6, 2025
  • Trade Surplus: Key Insights and Impacts on Currency

    August 30, 2024

Popular Posts

  • 1

    Secret Service admits leaning on ‘state and local partners’ after claim it ignored Trump team’s past requests

    July 21, 2024
  • 2

    Five more House Democrats call on Biden to drop out, third US senator

    July 19, 2024
  • 3

    Elon and Vivek should tackle US funding for this boondoogle organization and score a multimillion dollar win

    December 4, 2024
  • 4

    Forex Profit Calculator: Maximize Your Trading Potential

    July 10, 2024
  • 5

    Biden calls to ‘lower the temperature’ then bashes Trump in NAACP speech

    July 17, 2024

Categories

  • Economy (829)
  • Editor's Pick (6,247)
  • Investing (634)
  • Stock (935)

Latest Posts

  • Biden’s Cabinet condemns attempted assassination of former President Trump

    July 15, 2024
  • Trump wants to visit China again after he takes office: report

    January 19, 2025
  • ‘Intensely loyal’ Jill Biden aide despised by White House staffers, new book claims

    May 28, 2025

Recent Posts

  • Vance’s ‘America First’ approach goes global, takes hardline message to Greenland

    March 28, 2025
  • Biden admin faces mounting pressure to allow Ukraine to strike inside Russia with US missiles

    September 13, 2024
  • Trump, Putin call expected this week, as admin edges closer to Russia-Ukraine ceasefire deal: Witkoff

    March 16, 2025

Editor’s Pick

  • Trump clarifies he meant Cheney wouldn’t have ‘guts’ to fight a war with rifle comment after Dem backlash

    November 2, 2024
  • Trump campaign declares ‘clear victory’ in Harris debate

    September 13, 2024
  • Trump says ‘I think we have a deal’ on Gaza war

    September 26, 2025
  • About us
  • Contacts
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions

Disclaimer: moneyrisetoday.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

Copyright © 2025 moneyrisetoday.com | All Rights Reserved

Money Rise Today – Investing and Stock News
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
Money Rise Today – Investing and Stock News
  • Investing
  • Stock