• Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
Money Rise Today – Investing and Stock News
  • Investing
  • Stock
Editor's Pick

Senators sound off as Supreme Court hears case on nationwide injunctions

by May 16, 2025
written by May 16, 2025

With the Supreme Court hearing its first case Thursday relating to nationwide injunctions – federal district court judges issuing rulings that affect the entire country – several proponents of a plan to end the practice are speaking out. 

Senate Judiciary Committee member John Kennedy, R-La., said it appears to be a case of the ‘tail wag[ging] the dog,’ in that it is the judiciary’s job to adjudicate the law, not create it.

‘When Congress makes a law, the federal judges are supposed to follow it. When the president exercises his power under Article II, judges are supposed to follow it, so long as it’s lawful,’ Kennedy said.

‘They can’t just overturn it because they don’t agree with it, and that’s what a lot of these federal judges are doing.’

In a Fox News Opinion piece this week, Kennedy noted ‘universal injunctions’ have been around since the 1960s, when judges began enjoining the government from enforcing certain policies against ‘anyone, anywhere’ – adding they let a judge say ‘sayonara’ to laws, regulations or even whims of a president they don’t like.

Kennedy noted that there have only been 27 such injunctions from JFK through Y2K. 

A review showed none was lodged against Presidents George H.W. Bush or Bill Clinton – but began to creep in during the George W. Bush and Barack Obama administrations.

With nearly 100 rulings against President Donald Trump in his one-and-an-eighth terms, Kennedy said some judges seem to want to ‘rewrite the Constitution every other Thursday, to advance some social or economic agenda that they can’t get by the voters: But the law is the law.’

‘And a universal injunction was created out of whole cloth. There’s no statutory basis for a universal injunction,’ the Louisianan said, echoing the analysis in his op-ed.

Given his penchant for often colorful and probing questions of judiciary appointees, Kennedy was also asked how an unfavorable ruling from the Supreme Court could affect nominee choices and further politicize the process.

‘All the nominees in front of us are going to be asked about universal injunctions, I can tell you. And if they try to dodge and bob and weave and run like a hound on the treeline, when it’s my turn to question them I’m not going to let them. I’m not asking how they would rule in a particular case, but I want to know what they think the legal basis is for a universal injunction, because there is none: I want to hear what they had to say.’

Sen. Tommy Tuberville – who joined Kennedy and others in supporting Iowa Sen. Charles Grassley’s Judicial Relief Clarification Act (JCRA) to end the practice – said such ‘woke’ judges should consider retiring their robes.

‘President Trump campaigned on a promise to deport dangerous criminals and won in a landslide. In just four months, he has already delivered the most secure border in American history,’ Tuberville told Fox News Digital.

‘Unfortunately, we have radical left judges who are allowing their personal beliefs to supersede the will of 77 million Americans who voted for President Trump and his agenda,’ the former Auburn football legend added.

‘If a judge wants to make political decisions, they should run for office. Otherwise, they should focus on upholding the Constitution and enforcing the law.’

Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, also said he supports the JCRA, calling nationwide injunctions ‘a real problem.’

‘[A] single federal judge can essentially stop a popularly elected president dead in his tracks by a temporary restraining order, which doesn’t just deal with the parties in front of the judge, but literally the whole nation.’

‘If the Supreme Court doesn’t do it in the context of this birthright citizenship case, then Congress needs to continue to pursue this via Senator Grassley’s bill and other means.’

While the case argued Thursday involves an injunction with regard to the interpretation of birthright citizenship in the law, Cornyn said that the court will determine the scope of that particular order, but that the idea of nationwide injunctions is being abused.

For his part, Grassley previously told Fox News Digital that such injunctions ‘are an unconstitutional abuse of judicial power.’

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS
0 comment
0
FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

previous post
Israel turns tables on UN official claiming ‘genocide’ in Gaza with basic questions
next post
Trump appointee Barrett challenges administration on nationwide injunctions, surprises and delights liberals

related articles

Steve Bannon has two-word answer to dismiss 2028...

August 7, 2025

Biden camp skipped Super Bowl interview amid Robert...

August 7, 2025

$93 million in aid to fight malnutrition headed...

August 7, 2025

Republican senator claims RFK Jr. mRNA vaccine decision...

August 7, 2025

Who is Anita Dunn? The Biden confidante who...

August 7, 2025

Veteran Biden insider Anita Dunn appears in House...

August 7, 2025

Veteran Biden insider Anita Dunn to appear in...

August 7, 2025

Trump-Putin meeting agreed upon ‘in principle,’ Kremlin aide...

August 7, 2025

Junk food banned from SNAP benefits in 6...

August 7, 2025

DOJ turns to Gabbard’s office for next step...

August 6, 2025
Enter Your Information Below To Receive Free Trading Ideas, Latest News, And Articles.


Your information is secure and your privacy is protected. By opting in you agree to receive emails from us. Remember that you can opt-out any time, we hate spam too!

Latest News

  • Trump bans federal funding for ‘dangerous’ gain-of-function research

    May 5, 2025
  • Trump’s massive 46% Vietnam tariffs could hit Nike, American Eagle and Wayfair

    April 3, 2025
  • Garland lauds ‘principled’ Wray for ‘integrity and skill’ after resignation announcement

    December 12, 2024
  • On air, ’60 Minutes’ reporter says ‘none of us is happy’ about changes that led top producer to quit

    April 28, 2025
  • Amazon sued by D.C. AG for allegedly excluding neighborhoods from Prime delivery

    December 5, 2024

Popular Posts

  • 1

    Secret Service admits leaning on ‘state and local partners’ after claim it ignored Trump team’s past requests

    July 21, 2024
  • 2

    Five more House Democrats call on Biden to drop out, third US senator

    July 19, 2024
  • 3

    Elon and Vivek should tackle US funding for this boondoogle organization and score a multimillion dollar win

    December 4, 2024
  • 4

    Forex Profit Calculator: Maximize Your Trading Potential

    July 10, 2024
  • 5

    Biden calls to ‘lower the temperature’ then bashes Trump in NAACP speech

    July 17, 2024

Categories

  • Economy (829)
  • Editor's Pick (5,659)
  • Investing (634)
  • Stock (876)

Latest Posts

  • Israel-Hamas cease-fire, hostage release deal reached: ‘Americans will be part of that’

    January 15, 2025
  • Trump foreign policy: 6 issues he got right and the experts were wrong

    January 16, 2025
  • Gold and silver: the price of gold stabilized above $2410

    July 24, 2024

Recent Posts

  • ApeCoin and Akita Inu: ApeCoin has retested at 0.830 level

    July 17, 2024
  • Harris’ favorability sees dramatic spike after Biden drops out: poll

    July 28, 2024
  • Kamala Harris now backed by more than half of delegates needed to win nomination: report

    July 22, 2024

Editor’s Pick

  • Trump’s aluminum tariffs may force Coca-Cola to use more plastic bottles

    February 12, 2025
  • Long AER: AerCap Defends Key Support at $100, Bullish Momentum Builds After Strong Earnings Beat

    March 3, 2025
  • Pepsi sued by federal regulators for giving Walmart preferential soft-drink pricing

    January 17, 2025
  • About us
  • Contacts
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions

Disclaimer: moneyrisetoday.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

Copyright © 2025 moneyrisetoday.com | All Rights Reserved

Money Rise Today – Investing and Stock News
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
Money Rise Today – Investing and Stock News
  • Investing
  • Stock