• Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
Money Rise Today – Investing and Stock News
  • Investing
  • Stock
Editor's Pick

Democrat grills Hegseth on whether he’ll take ‘accountability’ for Signal chat once DOD IG report drops

by June 12, 2025
written by June 12, 2025

Rep. Seth Moulton, D-Mass., confronted Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth Thursday in a tense exchange over whether Hegseth improperly shared classified details about U.S. airstrikes against Houthi rebels.

In what was the sharpest line of questioning during a week of congressional hearings, Moulton pressed Hegseth to take ‘accountability’ if it’s confirmed he disclosed sensitive operational timing on an unclassified chat app.

‘When you texted the launch time for F-18s going into combat over enemy territory, facing anti-aircraft missiles, on an unclassified Signal chat – did that launch time come from Central Command? Yes or no?’ demanded Moulton, a Marine Corps veteran. 

Hegseth declined to give a direct answer, stating that any communication from the secretary of defense is inherently classified.

‘As you know, having served yourself, any way that the secretary of defense communicates or provides information in and of itself is classified and not to be discussed,’ Hegseth responded.

Moulton pressed again for specifics: ‘So what was the classification marking of the launch time when it was sent to you? Because DoD regulations require classified information to be labeled. Was it secret or top secret?’

Hegseth sidestepped, emphasizing the mission’s outcome. 

‘What’s not classified is that it was an incredibly successful mission against the Houthis,’ he said. 

‘OK, so it was classified,’ Moulton replied. ‘Are you trying to say that the information was unclassified?’ 

‘I’m not trying to say anything,’ Hegseth said.

Moulton then accused the secretary of receiving marked classified information from Central Command and allegedly sharing it outside secure channels.

He also noted the Pentagon inspector general is expected to release a report ‘in a few days’ on the matter. ‘If the DoD inspector general finds what is pretty obvious… that the information was, in fact, classified, do you plan to take any accountability for that?’ Moulton asked.

Hegseth pushed back, stating, ‘There were no names, targets, locations, units, routes, sources, methods – no classified information.’

When pressed again on whether he would accept accountability if the report finds a breach, Hegseth added: ‘Of course. I serve at the pleasure of the president, like everybody else.’

Moulton shifted gears to question the cost of the U.S. campaign against the Houthis, citing reports suggesting the operation topped $1 billion. ‘How many U.S.-flagged commercial ships have transited the Red Sea since your so-called successful operation?’ he asked. ‘The answer is zero.’

The Pentagon IG probe, launched in April, will examine whether Hegseth improperly discussed operational plans for a U.S. offensive against the Houthis in Yemen and will also review ‘compliance with classification and records retention requirements,’ according to a memo from Inspector General Steven Stebbins.

Hegseth’s Signal messages to the president’s principal advisers, leaked when former national security advisor Mike Waltz inadvertently added the Atlantic magazine’s Jeffrey Goldberg to the chat, revealed F-18, Navy fighter aircraft, MQ-9s, drones and Tomahawks cruise missiles would be used in the strike on the Houthis.

‘1215et: F-18s LAUNCH (1st strike package),’ Hegseth said in one message notifying the chat of high-level administration officials that the attack was about to kick off.

‘1345: ‘Trigger Based’ F-18 1st Strike Window Starts (Target Terrorist is @ his Known Location so SHOULD BE ON TIME – also, Strike Drones Launch (MQ-9s)’ he added, according to the report. 

‘1410: More F-18s LAUNCH (2nd strike package)’

‘1415: Strike Drones on Target (THIS IS WHEN THE FIRST BOMBS WILL DEFINITELY DROP, pending earlier ‘Trigger Based’ targets)’

‘1536 F-18 2nd Strike Starts – also, first sea-based Tomahawks launched.’

‘MORE TO FOLLOW (per timeline)’

‘We are currently clean on OPSEC’ – that is, operational security.

Trump administration officials have long insisted that nothing classified was shared over the chat. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS
0 comment
0
FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

previous post
Trump warns Israel strike on Iran ‘could happen’ amid Middle East evacuation, nuclear negotiations
next post
Trump’s plan to slash ‘woke’ foreign aid, NPR funds clears House as Senate battle looms

related articles

Trump doubles down on voiding Biden autopen actions,...

December 3, 2025

Hegseth erupts over WaPo ‘fake stories’, vows to...

December 3, 2025

GOP fractures over Hegseth’s ‘double-tap’ Caribbean strike as...

December 2, 2025

Trump lays out where he stands with Elon...

December 2, 2025

Hegseth erupts over WaPo ‘fake stories’ smear, vows...

December 2, 2025

Taxpayers on the hook for lawn care, fixing...

December 2, 2025

Experts dispute Nigerian government’s claims amid congressional probe...

December 2, 2025

Putin warns Russia ‘ready’ if Europe ‘suddenly wants...

December 2, 2025

Rosie O’Donnell says daughter blames Trump for forcing...

December 2, 2025

Johnson points to Obama-era drone precedent as Congress...

December 2, 2025
Enter Your Information Below To Receive Free Trading Ideas, Latest News, And Articles.


Your information is secure and your privacy is protected. By opting in you agree to receive emails from us. Remember that you can opt-out any time, we hate spam too!

Latest News

  • SpaceX launch scrubbed hours after Hegseth shares message to rescue mission crew: ‘Wish you Godspeed’

    March 13, 2025
  • DAVID MARCUS: Calling Rep. Sarah McBride ‘mister’ isn’t impolite, it’s just reality

    March 12, 2025
  • ‘He’s not a big factor’: Trump’s Senate allies dismiss Elon Musk’s calls to ‘kill the bill’

    June 5, 2025
  • Supreme Court limits judges’ authority to block infrastructure projects over environmental concerns

    May 29, 2025
  • Sen. Mike Lee warns Democrats would ‘Rule America uncontested for 100 years’ if they sweep 2024 elections

    November 4, 2024

Popular Posts

  • 1

    Secret Service admits leaning on ‘state and local partners’ after claim it ignored Trump team’s past requests

    July 21, 2024
  • 2

    Five more House Democrats call on Biden to drop out, third US senator

    July 19, 2024
  • 3

    District judges’ orders blocking Trump agenda face hearing in top Senate committee

    April 2, 2025
  • 4

    Forex Profit Calculator: Maximize Your Trading Potential

    July 10, 2024
  • 5

    Elon and Vivek should tackle US funding for this boondoogle organization and score a multimillion dollar win

    December 4, 2024

Categories

  • Economy (829)
  • Editor's Pick (6,937)
  • Investing (634)
  • Stock (958)

Latest Posts

  • Trading Economics: The True Risks and Rewards

    July 15, 2024
  • Diet and nutrition experts weigh in on how RFK Jr’s nomination could impact how we eat

    January 6, 2025
  • Trump welcomes Polish president with flyover tribute to fallen fighter pilot

    September 3, 2025

Recent Posts

  • Biden undergoes radiation therapy for cancer, spokesperson says

    October 11, 2025
  • S&P 500 and Nasdaq under pressure from global events

    August 6, 2024
  • Harris campaign abandons Biden in final weeks before Election Day: report

    October 20, 2024

Editor’s Pick

  • Trump’s WLFI $336M crypto holdings spark concerns ahead of White House summit

    March 6, 2025
  • Trump moves to broker Putin-Zelenskyy meeting following DC peace talks

    August 19, 2025
  • Trump says he will meet with Putin, Zelenskyy ‘if necessary’ amid negotiations to end war

    May 28, 2025
  • About us
  • Contacts
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions

Disclaimer: moneyrisetoday.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

Copyright © 2025 moneyrisetoday.com | All Rights Reserved

Money Rise Today – Investing and Stock News
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
Money Rise Today – Investing and Stock News
  • Investing
  • Stock