• Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
Money Rise Today – Investing and Stock News
  • Investing
  • Stock
Editor's Pick

Democrats dodge questions as House GOP prepares contempt votes against the Clintons

by January 21, 2026
written by January 21, 2026

House Democrats are largely mum about whether they’ll help Republicans advance a pair of contempt resolutions against former President Bill Clinton and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton on Wednesday.

The House Oversight Committee is meeting at 10 a.m. to weigh a pair of reports on holding the Clintons in contempt of Congress for defying subpoenas in the panel’s Jeffrey Epstein probe. What’s likely to be hours of debate will be followed by votes on whether to tee up those reports as House-wide votes on resolutions referring the former first couple to the Department of Justice (DOJ) for criminal prosecution.

The resolutions are likely to advance, at least along party lines. But two Democrats on the committee who spoke with Fox News Digital on Tuesday were careful to avoid making concrete decisions before the pivotal votes.

‘Right now, we should all be focused on releasing the Epstein files,’ Rep. Ro Khanna, D-Calif., told Fox News Digital. ‘After the files are released, call in the Clintons, and they should testify, as should anyone. But it’s premature to be calling in people to testify when the files haven’t been released.’

Khanna, along with Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., led a successful effort to force a vote on mandating that the DOJ release nearly all of its Epstein files. 

The DOJ has yet to produce more than a fraction of the documents, however, more than a month after the deadline set by Congress.

When asked directly how he would vote regarding the Clintons on Wednesday, Khanna said, ‘I would say that they need to come in after the files are released.’

Rep. Suhas Subramanyam, D-Va., a first-term member of the committee, told Fox News Digital when asked how he’ll vote, ‘We’ll see how they’re treating all of the other people who have not complied completely with the committee, because I think what they’ve started doing is making this partisan.’

The Clintons were two of 10 people subpoenaed to appear before the committee after a unanimous committee vote to launch the investigation.

To date, however, just one of those original 10 people — former Trump Attorney General Bill Barr — has appeared in person. Former Trump Labor Secretary Alex Azar was also deposed pursuant to a separate subpoena.

But the Clintons are the only two so far who Republicans have pursued contempt charges against, arguing they have repeatedly refused to work with the committee in good faith on scheduling their depositions. The Clintons’ lawyers said the subpoenas are not legally valid.

‘It should be an interesting hearing, because if they’re going to hold the Clintons in contempt, I’m interested to hear if they’ll hold anyone else in contempt, including Republicans in this administration,’ Subramanyam said.

Multiple requests for comment to the remaining 19 Democrats on the committee went unanswered on Tuesday.

That includes Rep. Robert Garcia, D-Calif., the top Democrat on the committee, who did not attend either of the panel’s scheduled depositions with the Clintons in January.

Rep. Emily Randall, D-Wash., another member of the panel, even waved Fox News Digital off during an attempt to ask about her thoughts on the Clinton contempt effort. She claimed she was engaged in an ‘intense’ conversation with a congressional aide.

Garcia had previously accused House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer, R-Ky., of hypocrisy in trying to hold the Clintons accountable while not pushing harder to enforce the subpoena aimed at forcing the DOJ to release all of its Epstein files, which it has not yet done.

‘I think it’s incredibly hypocritical for James Comer to go out and try to hold in contempt his political enemies while [Attorney General Pam Bondi] is actively breaking the law, and he refuses to hold her in contempt,’ Garcia told MS NOW last week.

But in his opening remarks ahead of the committee meeting, Comer is expected to argue that it would be Democrats who are acting hypocritical if they do not vote to hold House-wide contempt votes.

‘We’ve offered flexibility on scheduling. The response we received was not cooperation, but defiance, marked by repeated delays, excuses, and obstruction,’ Comer will say, according to remarks obtained by Fox News Digital. ‘Today, the Clintons must be held accountable for their actions. And Democrats must support these measures, or they will be exposed as hypocrites.’

Neither of the Clintons have been implicated in any wrongdoing related to Epstein.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS
0 comment
0
FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

previous post
Former Rep MTG dumps cold water on Trump’s Greenland acquisition ambitions: ‘We’ve heard that one before’
next post
Secretary Rubio scheduled to face former colleagues on Venezuela policy

related articles

Who is Lisa Cook? The Fed governor at...

January 21, 2026

Trump rips Europe at Davos for wrong ‘direction,’...

January 21, 2026

Secretary Rubio scheduled to face former colleagues on...

January 21, 2026

Trump doubles down on Greenland push as polls...

January 21, 2026

Former Rep MTG dumps cold water on Trump’s...

January 21, 2026

Former Rep. MTG dumps cold water on Trump’s...

January 21, 2026

Davos braces for Trump amid tensions over NATO,...

January 21, 2026

Comer dares Democrats to advance Clinton contempt of...

January 21, 2026

Netanyahu agrees to join Trump’s Gaza Board of...

January 21, 2026

Gov Whitmer says America ‘ready for a woman...

January 21, 2026
Enter Your Information Below To Receive Free Trading Ideas, Latest News, And Articles.


Your information is secure and your privacy is protected. By opting in you agree to receive emails from us. Remember that you can opt-out any time, we hate spam too!

Latest News

  • RFK Jr and top Dem clash during heated Senate hearing: ‘This is about kids’

    September 4, 2025
  • Marjorie Taylor Greene shares what’s next for House DOGE panel, whether Elon Musk would testify

    February 12, 2025
  • SafeMoon and LItecoin: SafeMoon tests new weekly support

    July 31, 2024
  • Union Pacific to buy Norfolk in $85 billion mega U.S. railroad deal

    July 29, 2025
  • Gold and silver: the price of gold successfully tested $2400

    July 15, 2024

Popular Posts

  • 1

    District judges’ orders blocking Trump agenda face hearing in top Senate committee

    April 2, 2025
  • 2

    Secret Service admits leaning on ‘state and local partners’ after claim it ignored Trump team’s past requests

    July 21, 2024
  • 3

    Five more House Democrats call on Biden to drop out, third US senator

    July 19, 2024
  • 4

    Forex Profit Calculator: Maximize Your Trading Potential

    July 10, 2024
  • 5

    Elon and Vivek should tackle US funding for this boondoogle organization and score a multimillion dollar win

    December 4, 2024

Categories

  • Economy (829)
  • Editor's Pick (7,584)
  • Investing (858)
  • Stock (967)

Latest Posts

  • Why Trump zeroed in on Greenland and why it matters in 3 maps

    January 18, 2026
  • Homesick GOP senators mull throwing out the rules over stonewalling Dems

    July 31, 2025
  • Bucking trend, McDonald’s vows no egg surcharges as it preps $1 Egg McMuffin Day

    February 26, 2025

Recent Posts

  • Trump meets NATO’s Rutte amid canceled Putin meeting: ‘It didn’t feel right to me’

    October 22, 2025
  • Longtime Joe Biden aide to appear under subpoena after Jill’s ‘work husband’ pleads Fifth

    July 18, 2025
  • Direct aid to Israel should be phased out to ‘reduce US leverage,’ influential conservative groups argue

    March 13, 2025

Editor’s Pick

  • DAVID MARCUS: Sorry Dems, literally nobody believes married women can’t get IDs

    April 12, 2025
  • South African-born Musk evoked by Trump during meeting with nation’s leader: ‘Don’t want to get Elon involved’

    May 21, 2025
  • US warns Americans to flee Syria or prepare to ‘shelter in place for extended periods’

    December 16, 2024
  • About us
  • Contacts
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions

Disclaimer: moneyrisetoday.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

Copyright © 2025 moneyrisetoday.com | All Rights Reserved

Money Rise Today – Investing and Stock News
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
Money Rise Today – Investing and Stock News
  • Investing
  • Stock