• Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
Money Rise Today – Investing and Stock News
  • Investing
  • Stock
Editor's Pick

GOP lawmaker accuses Jack Smith of ‘spying’ on Congress at tense House hearing over Trump probe

by January 22, 2026
written by January 22, 2026

Former special counsel Jack Smith spent hours publicly defending the parameters of his investigation into President Donald Trump on Thursday in the face of sharp questions from Republicans on the House Judiciary Committee — including one lawmaker in particular who repeatedly accused Smith of ‘spying’ on certain lawmakers. 

During one of the most contentious portions of the hearing, Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., pressed Smith over the so-called ‘tolling records’ Smith sought as part of the special counsel investigation, which included investigating Trump’s alleged attempts to subvert the results of the 2020 election. 

Unlike wiretaps, tolling records are phone logs that reveal the phone numbers of incoming and outgoing callers, as well as the time and duration of calls. Republicans have zeroed in on the tolling records in recent months, blasting them as an aggressive tactic by Smith and an act of ‘political weaponization,’ which Smith vehemently denied.

Issa, in particular, excoriated Smith for the decision to seek the tolling records of Republicans in the House and Senate — which he said Thursday was tantamount to spying on his political ‘enemies.’

Smith, for his part, defended the tolling records as ‘common practice’ in such investigations.

‘Maybe they’re not your political enemies, but they sure as [heck] were Joe Biden’s poltiical enemies, weren’t they?’ Issa asked Smith. ‘They were Harris’s political enemies,’ he said, referring to the former vice president. ‘They were the enemies of the president — and you were their arm, weren’t you?’ 

‘No,’ Smith said. 

‘So, you spied on the speaker of the House and these other senators and so on, and informed no one — and in fact, put a gag order in — so they couldn’t discover it,’ Issa said.

Smith attempted to respond before Issa continued. 

‘Why did Congress, a separate branch that you, under the Constitution, have to respect — why is it that no one should be informed — including the judges?’ Issa pressed. ‘As you went in to spy on these people, did you mention that you were spying on, [that you were] seeking records to you could find out about when conversations occurred between the U.S. Speaker of the House and the president?’

‘Did you inform the judge?’ Issa continued. ‘Or did you hold that back?’

‘My office didn’t spy on anyone,’ Smith said, before Issa cut back in. 

‘Wait a second,’ he interjected sharply. ‘The question I asked you, Mr. Smith, was pretty straightforward.’

Before Smith could respond again, the panel’s ranking Democrat, Rep. Jamie Raskin, interjected to address House Judiciary Chairman Jim Jordan. 

‘Mr. Chairman, would you please instruct the gentleman to allow the witness to answer the question?’ he said. ‘The witness has the right to answer the question.’

Smith previously said that the Public Integrity Section had signed off on the subpoenas, a point corroborated by previously released public records. Those records also showed that the Public Integrity Section told prosecutors to be wary of concerns lawmakers could raise about the Constitution’s speech or debate clause, which gives Congress members added protections.

The subpoenas to the phone companies were accompanied by gag orders blocking the lawmakers from learning about the existence of the subpoenas for at least one year.

Smith previously told the House lawmakers in a closed-door hearing that the D.C. federal court, which authorized the gag orders, would not have been aware that they applied to Congress members. 

‘I don’t think we identified that, because I don’t think that was Department policy at the time,’ Smith said.

Asked during the earlier deposition about who should be held accountable for lawmakers who felt that the seizure of a narrow set of their phone data was a constitutional violation, Smith said Trump should be held accountable.

‘These records are people, in the case of the Senators, Donald Trump directed his co-conspirators to call these people to further delay the proceedings,’ Smith said.

‘He chose to do that. If Donald Trump had chosen to call a number of Democratic senators, we would have gotten toll records for Democratic Senators. So responsibility for why these records, why we collected them, that’s — that lies with Donald Trump,’ he said at the time.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS
0 comment
0
FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

previous post
US midday market brief: Dow climbs over 300 points after Trump eases Greenland concerns
next post
Patel reveals bizarre ‘self-awarded’ trophy former FBI officials made to celebrate Trump probe

related articles

DHS scorches Pritzker’s ‘sanctuary’ state after child rapist...

May 1, 2026

Socialist mayor’s blunt 1-word message to fleeing millionaires...

May 1, 2026

DC police captain cites bodycam footage of officers...

May 1, 2026

Amazon explores ‘The Apprentice’ reboot with Trump Jr...

May 1, 2026

MN governor race to replace Walz sees major...

May 1, 2026

Trump’s apocalyptic Iran warning raises stakes for sweeping...

April 7, 2026

Graham eyes ‘down payment’ on Trump-backed SAVE Act...

April 7, 2026

Democrat whose parents fled Iran moves to oust...

April 7, 2026

Midterm alarm bells: Democrats face steep favorability deficit...

April 7, 2026

American journalist kidnapped in Iraq is set free,...

April 7, 2026
Enter Your Information Below To Receive Free Trading Ideas, Latest News, And Articles.


Your information is secure and your privacy is protected. By opting in you agree to receive emails from us. Remember that you can opt-out any time, we hate spam too!

Latest News

  • Trump energy chief declares climate change a ‘global physical phenomenon’ amid reversal of Biden-era policies

    March 11, 2025
  • White House says 9th telecoms company has been hacked as part of Chinese espionage campaign

    December 28, 2024
  • The 6 biggest FBI scandals under the Biden administration

    January 2, 2025
  • S&P 500 could fall to 6,150: analyst explains how to play the dip

    March 31, 2026
  • Special counsel Jack Smith appeals dismissal of Trump Mar-a-Lago case

    August 26, 2024

Popular Posts

  • 1

    District judges’ orders blocking Trump agenda face hearing in top Senate committee

    April 2, 2025
  • 2

    Secret Service admits leaning on ‘state and local partners’ after claim it ignored Trump team’s past requests

    July 21, 2024
  • 3

    Five more House Democrats call on Biden to drop out, third US senator

    July 19, 2024
  • 4

    CoreWeave eyes $1.5B bond raise to ease debt load following lacklustre IPO: report

    May 9, 2025
  • 5

    Forex Profit Calculator: Maximize Your Trading Potential

    July 10, 2024

Categories

  • Economy (829)
  • Editor's Pick (8,507)
  • Investing (2,283)
  • Stock (1,028)

Latest Posts

  • Hong Kong tests its own ChatGPT-style AI tool amid OpenAI access restrictions

    July 18, 2024
  • The dollar index managed to stabilize and start a recovery

    August 7, 2024
  • EXCLUSIVE: Jubilant Mike Johnson claims victory as Florida helps House GOP grow majority

    April 2, 2025

Recent Posts

  • Soaring Corning stock price faces two major risks

    April 9, 2026
  • Democratic lawmaker demands Musk, OPM stop sending mass emails to staffers: ‘Chaotic’

    February 28, 2025
  • ‘Ghost ships’ ferrying illicit oil have sailed into Trump’s crosshairs

    December 16, 2025

Editor’s Pick

  • Great selloff in precious metals markets: Is diversification dead?

    February 3, 2026
  • Senate unanimously agrees to send bill demanding Epstein file release to Trump’s desk

    November 19, 2025
  • Why is Broadcom warning of tighter supply in AI hardware?

    March 24, 2026
  • About us
  • Contacts
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions

Disclaimer: moneyrisetoday.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

Copyright © 2025 moneyrisetoday.com | All Rights Reserved

Money Rise Today – Investing and Stock News
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
Money Rise Today – Investing and Stock News
  • Investing
  • Stock