• Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
Money Rise Today – Investing and Stock News
  • Investing
  • Stock
Editor's Pick

House Democrats demand answers on DOJ’s move to fire former special counsel officials

by January 29, 2025
written by January 29, 2025

House Democrats are demanding answers regarding the Justice Department’s move this week to fire more than a dozen officials involved in former Special Counsel Jack Smith’s investigation, arguing the action was in ‘complete contradiction’ of President Trump’s effort to keep a ‘merit-based system’ for government employees. 

House Judiciary Committee Ranking Member Jamie Raskin, D-Md., and House Oversight Committee Ranking Member Gerald Connolly, D-Ma., penned a letter to acting Attorney General James McHenry Tuesday, obtained by Fox News. 

‘We write to you with alarm and profound concern about reports of the administration engaging in the widespread summary firing and involuntary reassignment of excellent career prosecutors and federal agents throughout the Department of Justice (DOJ),’ they wrote. ‘This onslaught against effective DOJ civil servants began within hours of President Donald Trump’s inauguration, in complete contradiction of the president’s repeated pledges to maintain a merit-based system for government employment.’ 

Raskin and Connolly added that the officials worked ‘strenuously to defend the rule of law have been removed from their positions without any evaluation—much less any negative evaluation—of their work.’ 

McHenry, on Monday, fired more than a dozen key officials on Smith’s team who worked to prosecute the president, saying that they could not be trusted in ‘faithfully implementing the president’s agenda.’ 

Fox News Digital first reported the news exclusively on Monday. 

Raskin and Connolly argued that the officials terminated on Monday were ‘part of an expert, non-political workforce tasked with protecting our national security and public safety.’ 

‘They have been hired and promoted based on their professional merit and excellence,’ they wrote, adding that ‘many of them have decades of experience under their belt and have served under, been promoted by, and received awards from presidential administrations of both major political parties, including President Trump’s first administration.’ 

The Democrats argued that McHenry removed them from their posts ‘without regard to their demonstrated competencies, their recognized achievements, or their devoted service to the Department, in some cases reassigning them to areas that are outside of their legal expertise.’ 

‘By removing them from their positions in this hasty and unprincipled way, you have very likely violated longstanding federal laws,’ they wrote, also accusing McHenry of having ‘taken aim at law students who applied to, interviewed for, and received offers from the Department based on their demonstrated academic achievements and their commitment to public service.’ 

The Democrats claimed that the DOJ ‘rescinded job offers to summer interns and entry-level attorneys hired through the Attorney General’s Honors Program, a highly competitive 72-year-old recruitment program that receives applications from students at hundreds of law schools across the country.’

‘We have also received disturbing reports surfacing that White House staff are playing a substantial role in these employment decisions and examining career civil servants’ LinkedIn and other social media profiles to ascertain their personal political leanings,’ Raskin and Connolly wrote. ‘Taken together, your actions raise significant concern that you are determined to fill the ranks of the DOJ and FBI with career employees selected for the personal loyalty or political services they have rendered to President Trump.’ 

Raskin and Connolly are demanding the DOJ provide them with a list of names of officials who have been reassigned or terminated; and provide any communications between the DOJ and the White House since Inauguration Day regarding the content of personal social media accounts of career DOJ employees or applicants. 

Raskin and Connolly demanded the information by Feb. 11 at 5:00 p.m. 

Their letter comes after McHenry, on Monday, transmitted a letter to each official notifying them of their termination, a Justice Department official exclusively told Fox News Digital. It is unclear how many officials received that letter. The names of the individuals were not immediately released. 

‘Acting Attorney General James McHenry terminated the employment of a number of DOJ officials who played a significant role in prosecuting President Trump,’ a DOJ official told Fox News Digital. ‘In light of their actions, the Acting Attorney General does not trust these officials to assist in faithfully implementing the President’s agenda.’ 

This action ‘is consistent with the mission of ending the weaponization of government,’ the official told Fox News Digital.

The Justice Department did not immediately respond to Fox News Digital’s request for comment. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS
0 comment
0
FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

previous post
Quantum Computing Investments: Opportunities & Risks
next post
DAVID MARCUS: GOP owes RFK Jr. big time, and the debt is due

related articles

Top cops out: The attorney general firings and...

April 6, 2026

‘God is good’: Inside the high-risk US mission...

April 6, 2026

CENTCOM commander directed strike against an IRGC headquarters...

April 6, 2026

Trump touts airman rescue mission, boasts Iran could...

April 6, 2026

President Trump makes endorsement in California gubernatorial race:...

April 6, 2026

Iran war nears ‘completion’ as Trump eyes deadline...

April 6, 2026

Primary pause, political firestorm: High-stakes elections this month...

April 6, 2026

GOP races to pass ICE, Border Patrol funding...

April 6, 2026

Trump vows US will strike Iran’s power plants,...

April 5, 2026

Inside the daring rescue of airman behind enemy...

April 5, 2026
Enter Your Information Below To Receive Free Trading Ideas, Latest News, And Articles.


Your information is secure and your privacy is protected. By opting in you agree to receive emails from us. Remember that you can opt-out any time, we hate spam too!

Latest News

  • Iran remembers Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar as a ‘martyr’ and ‘model for the youth and children’

    October 18, 2024
  • ‘Integrity of the Court’: Cruz reintroduces amendment to combat court expansion efforts

    February 6, 2025
  • House Republicans eye FEMA fund overhaul ahead of high-stakes hearing on Helene recovery

    November 19, 2024
  • GOP senator pitches ‘Black Friday’ Obamacare fix that bridges Democrat, Republican demands

    December 9, 2025
  • CFTC chief sides with prediction markets over state regulators in a high-stakes court case

    March 13, 2026

Popular Posts

  • 1

    District judges’ orders blocking Trump agenda face hearing in top Senate committee

    April 2, 2025
  • 2

    Secret Service admits leaning on ‘state and local partners’ after claim it ignored Trump team’s past requests

    July 21, 2024
  • 3

    Five more House Democrats call on Biden to drop out, third US senator

    July 19, 2024
  • 4

    CoreWeave eyes $1.5B bond raise to ease debt load following lacklustre IPO: report

    May 9, 2025
  • 5

    Forex Profit Calculator: Maximize Your Trading Potential

    July 10, 2024

Categories

  • Economy (829)
  • Editor's Pick (8,492)
  • Investing (1,588)
  • Stock (1,015)

Latest Posts

  • Goodbye to ‘bags fly free’ on Southwest Airlines, the last freebie in America

    March 17, 2025
  • UN under fire as USAID investigators probe Hamas diversion of aid to Gaza

    November 4, 2025
  • Hillary, Bill Clinton stare down criminal contempt charges after defying House subpoenas in Epstein probe

    January 14, 2026

Recent Posts

  • Vivek Ramaswamy sounds off on potential RFK Jr. role in a Trump administration

    August 23, 2024
  • Khamenei calls Trump a ‘criminal,’ blames him for deadly protests sweeping Iran

    January 17, 2026
  • Why Southwest emerged as the top US airline stock in 2025?

    December 28, 2025

Editor’s Pick

  • Blue state Republicans threaten rebellion if Senate changes key provision in Trump’s ‘big, beautiful bill’

    June 5, 2025
  • Macy’s turnaround hinges on revamping some stores and closing others. It appears to be working.

    March 7, 2025
  • Why Justice Jackson is a fish out of water on the Supreme Court

    July 1, 2025
  • About us
  • Contacts
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions

Disclaimer: moneyrisetoday.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

Copyright © 2025 moneyrisetoday.com | All Rights Reserved

Money Rise Today – Investing and Stock News
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
Money Rise Today – Investing and Stock News
  • Investing
  • Stock