• Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
Money Rise Today – Investing and Stock News
  • Investing
  • Stock
Editor's Pick

Number of injunctions halting Trump policies trounces predecessors by double

by March 17, 2025
written by March 17, 2025

Nationwide injunctions ordered against the first Trump administration account for more than half of the total injunctions ordered against the federal government since 1963, data show. 

Nationwide injunctions are court orders that prevent the federal government from implementing a policy or law that has a cascading effect impacting the entire country, not just the parties involved in the court case. 

Trump’s first administration faced 64 injunctions out of the total 127 nationwide injunctions issued since 1963. There were 32 injunctions issued against the Bush, Obama and Biden administrations collectively since 2001, meaning the first Trump administration was on the receiving end of double the amount of nationwide injunctions than his two predecessors and successor combined, according to the April 2024 edition of the Harvard Law Review. 

The Harvard Law Review found there were six injunctions issued against the Bush administration, 12 against the Obama administration and 14 against the Biden administration. 

Trump’s return to the Oval Office in January has brought with it more than 120 lawsuits from activists, government employees and others targeting his executive orders and actions. The lawsuits have resulted in nationwide injunctions in some cases, including 15 in February alone, according to Trump’s acting solicitor general, Sarah Harris.

Trump filed an emergency appeal Thursday asking the Supreme Court to narrow three injunctions that were issued to halt Trump’s nullification of birthright citizenship. The emergency appeal requests the injunction only cover individuals directly impacted by the relevant courts. 

Harris argued in the emergency appeal that nationwide injunctions have hit ‘epidemic proportions’ under the second Trump administration, noting that the federal government faced 14 universal injunctions in the first three years of the Biden administration compared to 15 leveled against the Trump admin in one month alone. 

‘Years of experience have shown that the Executive Branch cannot properly perform its functions if any judge anywhere can enjoin every presidential action everywhere,’ Harris wrote.

Officials in the first Trump administration also railed against the flow of injunctions ordered against the 45th president’s policies and laws, including the former chiefs of the Department of Justice. 

‘Courts issued an average of only 1.5 nationwide injunctions per year against the Reagan, Clinton, and George W. Bush administrations, and 2.5 per year against the Obama administration,’ former Assistant Attorney General Beth Williams said in February 2019.  

‘In President Trump’s first year in office, however, judges issued a whopping 20 nationwide injunctions – an eightfold increase. This matches the entire eight-year total of such injunctions issued against President Obama during his two terms. We are now at 30, matching the total number of injunctions issued against the first 42 presidents combined.’

Former Trump administration Attorney General Bill Barr added in remarks later in 2019 that there were ‘only 27 nationwide injunctions­ in all of the 20th century’ compared to 37, at the time, against the first Trump administration. 

‘Since President Trump took office, federal district courts have issued 37 nationwide injunctions against the Executive Branch. That’s more than one a month. By comparison, during President Obama’s first two years, district courts issued two nationwide injunctions against the Executive Branch, both of which were vacated by the Ninth Circuit. And according to the Department’s best estimates, courts issued only 27 nationwide injunctions­ in all of the 20th century,’ the former AG said in May 2019. 

Harvard Law Review found that the judges who issued the injunctions against the first Trump administration were overwhelmingly ordered by judges who were appointed by a Democrat. 

Democratic-appointed judges ordered 92.2% of the injunctions against the Trump administration, meaning just five of the 64 injunctions were ordered by Republican-appointed judges. 

Republican-appointed judges ordered all 14 of the nationwide injunctions against the federal government under the Biden administration. 

Injunctions under the Bush and Obama eras were much more bipartisan, with 50% of the injunctions in the Bush era issued by Democratic-appointed judges, and Republican-appointed judges ordering 58.3% of the 12 injunctions in the Obama era. 

Fox News Digital’s Breanne Deppisch contributed to this report. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS
0 comment
0
FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

previous post
State Department says Ukraine ready to accept 30-day ceasefire deal: ‘Ball is now in Russia’s court’
next post
Plummeting stock, boycotts and flagging sales: What’s fueling turmoil for Tesla?

related articles

Trump’s apocalyptic Iran warning raises stakes for sweeping...

April 7, 2026

Graham eyes ‘down payment’ on Trump-backed SAVE Act...

April 7, 2026

Democrat whose parents fled Iran moves to oust...

April 7, 2026

Midterm alarm bells: Democrats face steep favorability deficit...

April 7, 2026

American journalist kidnapped in Iraq is set free,...

April 7, 2026

Dem Senate primary erupts in key state as...

April 7, 2026

Trump-backed candidate aims to pad GOP’s fragile House...

April 7, 2026

Ilhan Omar calls Trump an ‘unhinged lunatic,’ urges...

April 7, 2026

White House unleashes on Stacey Abrams in latest...

April 7, 2026

Former Virginia Gov Glenn Youngkin hints at political...

April 7, 2026
Enter Your Information Below To Receive Free Trading Ideas, Latest News, And Articles.


Your information is secure and your privacy is protected. By opting in you agree to receive emails from us. Remember that you can opt-out any time, we hate spam too!

Latest News

  • Trump rejects Iran’s counter-proposal in nuclear negotiations: ‘it’s just not acceptable’

    June 9, 2025
  • Lucid stock offers three big reasons to warrant a long-term investment

    March 12, 2026
  • Musk was never briefed on China war plans at Pentagon meeting, Trump and Hegseth say

    March 22, 2025
  • DHS shutdown looms as Johnson navigates GOP divide over stopgap solutions

    February 12, 2026
  • Europeans meet with Iranian officials face-to-face for first time since Israel, US bombings as sanctions loom

    July 26, 2025

Popular Posts

  • 1

    District judges’ orders blocking Trump agenda face hearing in top Senate committee

    April 2, 2025
  • 2

    Secret Service admits leaning on ‘state and local partners’ after claim it ignored Trump team’s past requests

    July 21, 2024
  • 3

    Five more House Democrats call on Biden to drop out, third US senator

    July 19, 2024
  • 4

    CoreWeave eyes $1.5B bond raise to ease debt load following lacklustre IPO: report

    May 9, 2025
  • 5

    Forex Profit Calculator: Maximize Your Trading Potential

    July 10, 2024

Categories

  • Economy (829)
  • Editor's Pick (8,502)
  • Investing (2,060)
  • Stock (1,017)

Latest Posts

  • U.S. homebuilders raise alarm over tariffs as sentiment falls to 5-month low

    February 19, 2025
  • Lindsey Graham says Trump backs Russia sanctions bill

    January 8, 2026
  • RFK Jr cancels $500 million in mRNA research, HHS to prioritize ‘safer’ vaccine alternatives

    August 5, 2025

Recent Posts

  • Trump and Biden offer Christmas greetings as US approaches transfer of power

    December 25, 2024
  • Trump warns ‘sick’ South American leader, reiterates ‘we need Greenland’ for national security

    January 5, 2026
  • Luke Combs’ brutal response to ‘liberal’ labels: ‘Why do we all care?’

    February 25, 2026

Editor’s Pick

  • ‘Master dealmaker’: Inside Trump’s budget bill victory amid House GOP rebellion

    February 27, 2025
  • Former VP Harris reportedly asking Hillary Clinton for advice on what to do after losing to Trump

    January 23, 2025
  • Why a credit freeze isn’t the end of identity theft

    February 21, 2026
  • About us
  • Contacts
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions

Disclaimer: moneyrisetoday.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

Copyright © 2025 moneyrisetoday.com | All Rights Reserved

Money Rise Today – Investing and Stock News
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
Money Rise Today – Investing and Stock News
  • Investing
  • Stock