• Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
Money Rise Today – Investing and Stock News
  • Investing
  • Stock
Editor's Pick

Putin residence drone attack dismissed as implausible as Ukraine accusations mount

by December 31, 2025
written by December 31, 2025

Escalating claims by Russia that Ukraine tried to hit a residence used by President Vladimir Putin with drones have been dismissed by a top military drone expert, who called the alleged attack ‘hard to fathom’ and tactically implausible.

Cameron Chell’s comments came as Moscow doubled down on accusations Kyiv has flatly denied, with the drone industry leader arguing the alleged strike announced Monday runs counter to Ukraine’s drone tactics.

Chell, the CEO and co-founder of Draganfly, a drone manufacturer that supplies to the U.S. Department of Defense and allied militaries, including Ukraine, said Russia’s claims lack credibility.

‘What really makes things usually very signature about Ukraine is that they are always incredibly clever about how they use drones,’ Chell told Fox News Digital.

‘They are clever from a cost perspective — let’s call it an efficiency perspective — but also very clever in their tactics,’ he added.

‘I find it hard to fathom that this drone attack even happened on Putin’s residence or that it was something that Ukraine orchestrated for a number of reasons,’ Chell said.

‘Based on the description of the alleged attack over the top of Putin’s residence, the drones would not have been launched from a very long distance away,’ he said.

‘This would have avoided up to 1000 km of air defense systems and then likely attacking one of the most heavily fortified air defense networks surrounding Putin’s Valdai residence.

‘The cost benefit analysis, not to mention the political analysis, also does not make sense,’ he added.

Chell’s comments came as Russia doubled down Tuesday on accusations that Ukraine attempted to strike a presidential palace in the Novgorod region using drones, allegedly to disrupt peace efforts.

Kyiv dismissed the allegation, with the timing also raising questions given the upbeat tone of a recent meeting between President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in Florida.

Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov claimed late Monday that 91 drones were intercepted en route to Putin’s residence on the shores of Lake Valdai.

His statement appeared to contradict earlier Defense Ministry tallies, which said 89 drones were shot down over eight regions, including 18 over Novgorod, later adding another 23.

Only after Lavrov spoke did the ministry allege that 49 drones intercepted over Bryansk, nearly 300 miles away, were also targeting Valdai.

Asked about wreckage, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said it was ‘a matter for our military,’ while calling Zelenskyy’s denial and Western skepticism ‘completely insane.’

Peskov said Russia’s diplomatic stance would be toughened, and Duma Speaker Vyacheslav Volodin vowed there could be ‘no forgiveness’ for Zelenskyy.

Chell said the story simply does not add up. ‘To attack Putin’s residence in the manner described would require much more sophisticated tactics than simply sending long-range, relatively slow-moving drones,’ he said.

Chell also noted that this was a night operation and therefore, it generally rules out accurate visual mapping navigation. 

‘Since the description of the attack also does not lend itself to the use of fiber optic communication, which requires a relatively close range launch point, these drones would likely have had to rely on GPS navigation,’ he explained.

‘This would easily have been thwarted in this area and the Ukrainians would have known this,’ Chell said.

Politically, Chell argued, Ukraine has nothing to gain. ‘They’re bold, but right in the middle of peace talks — when they need Trump on side — it makes no sense,’ he said. ‘Ukraine is just politically too smart to have done that.’

Zelenskyy on Monday also called the claim a complete fabrication, accusing Moscow of laying the groundwork for further attacks. 

Lavrov warned of retaliation but said Russia would continue talks with Washington.

Trump also said he learned of the alleged attack directly from Putin and was ‘very angry about it.’ Asked whether there was evidence, Trump replied, ‘We’ll find out.’

Fox News Digital has reached out to the Kremlin for comment.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS
0 comment
0
FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

previous post
Ukraine–Russia at a crossroads: How the war evolved in 2025 and what comes next

related articles

Ukraine–Russia at a crossroads: How the war evolved...

December 31, 2025

Congress blocks Obamacare subsidies after shutdown fight, premiums...

December 31, 2025

ISIS exploiting Syria’s chaos as US strikes expose...

December 31, 2025

Congress fails to save Obamacare subsidies after shutdown...

December 31, 2025

DAN GAINOR: These are the seven most annoying...

December 31, 2025

Two African nations ban American citizens in diplomatic...

December 31, 2025

Putin residence drone attack dismissed as ‘implausible’ as...

December 31, 2025

DOJ’s second-in-command could be central to ‘vindictive’ prosecution...

December 30, 2025

Tatiana Schlossberg, JFK’s granddaughter, dies at 35 after...

December 30, 2025

Sen Jim Justice says Republicans are ‘lousy’ at...

December 30, 2025
Enter Your Information Below To Receive Free Trading Ideas, Latest News, And Articles.


Your information is secure and your privacy is protected. By opting in you agree to receive emails from us. Remember that you can opt-out any time, we hate spam too!

Latest News

  • SafeMoon and Litecoin: Targets and Prices for Tuesday

    October 8, 2024
  • Riot Platforms stock has a 71% upside: analyst

    August 1, 2024
  • Senate committee advances nomination of Dr Oz to run Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services

    March 25, 2025
  • Microsoft to roll out new autonomous AI agents next month, fending off challenge from Salesforce

    October 22, 2024
  • SCOTUS to hear straight woman’s discrimination case that could reshape employment law

    February 26, 2025

Popular Posts

  • 1

    Secret Service admits leaning on ‘state and local partners’ after claim it ignored Trump team’s past requests

    July 21, 2024
  • 2

    District judges’ orders blocking Trump agenda face hearing in top Senate committee

    April 2, 2025
  • 3

    Five more House Democrats call on Biden to drop out, third US senator

    July 19, 2024
  • 4

    Forex Profit Calculator: Maximize Your Trading Potential

    July 10, 2024
  • 5

    Elon and Vivek should tackle US funding for this boondoogle organization and score a multimillion dollar win

    December 4, 2024

Categories

  • Economy (829)
  • Editor's Pick (7,251)
  • Investing (740)
  • Stock (964)

Latest Posts

  • USAID activists say stopping ‘corporate welfare’ outweighs ending funds to terror-linked groups

    February 5, 2025
  • US-Ukraine rift breaks out at United Nations on 3rd anniversary of the war

    February 24, 2025
  • Israel hits the ‘heart’ of Iran’s nuclear program in Natanz facility strike

    June 13, 2025

Recent Posts

  • Microsoft plans September cybersecurity event to discuss changes after CrowdStrike outage

    August 25, 2024
  • Alcohol warning regulations hit struggling restaurants hard: here’s what you need to know

    January 9, 2025
  • Former Biden official ‘pleased’ Trump admin tackling antisemitism

    April 23, 2025

Editor’s Pick

  • Federal appeals court dismisses classified records case against former Trump co-defendants

    February 11, 2025
  • Memeinator has made waves in 2024: what makes MMTR a good investment?

    July 31, 2024
  • Republicans struggle with Trump’s mixed signals on ‘big, beautiful bill’

    May 15, 2025
  • About us
  • Contacts
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions

Disclaimer: moneyrisetoday.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

Copyright © 2025 moneyrisetoday.com | All Rights Reserved

Money Rise Today – Investing and Stock News
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
Money Rise Today – Investing and Stock News
  • Investing
  • Stock