• Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
Money Rise Today – Investing and Stock News
  • Investing
  • Stock
Editor's Pick

Democrats dodge questions as House GOP prepares contempt votes against the Clintons

by January 21, 2026
written by January 21, 2026

House Democrats are largely mum about whether they’ll help Republicans advance a pair of contempt resolutions against former President Bill Clinton and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton on Wednesday.

The House Oversight Committee is meeting at 10 a.m. to weigh a pair of reports on holding the Clintons in contempt of Congress for defying subpoenas in the panel’s Jeffrey Epstein probe. What’s likely to be hours of debate will be followed by votes on whether to tee up those reports as House-wide votes on resolutions referring the former first couple to the Department of Justice (DOJ) for criminal prosecution.

The resolutions are likely to advance, at least along party lines. But two Democrats on the committee who spoke with Fox News Digital on Tuesday were careful to avoid making concrete decisions before the pivotal votes.

‘Right now, we should all be focused on releasing the Epstein files,’ Rep. Ro Khanna, D-Calif., told Fox News Digital. ‘After the files are released, call in the Clintons, and they should testify, as should anyone. But it’s premature to be calling in people to testify when the files haven’t been released.’

Khanna, along with Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., led a successful effort to force a vote on mandating that the DOJ release nearly all of its Epstein files. 

The DOJ has yet to produce more than a fraction of the documents, however, more than a month after the deadline set by Congress.

When asked directly how he would vote regarding the Clintons on Wednesday, Khanna said, ‘I would say that they need to come in after the files are released.’

Rep. Suhas Subramanyam, D-Va., a first-term member of the committee, told Fox News Digital when asked how he’ll vote, ‘We’ll see how they’re treating all of the other people who have not complied completely with the committee, because I think what they’ve started doing is making this partisan.’

The Clintons were two of 10 people subpoenaed to appear before the committee after a unanimous committee vote to launch the investigation.

To date, however, just one of those original 10 people — former Trump Attorney General Bill Barr — has appeared in person. Former Trump Labor Secretary Alex Azar was also deposed pursuant to a separate subpoena.

But the Clintons are the only two so far who Republicans have pursued contempt charges against, arguing they have repeatedly refused to work with the committee in good faith on scheduling their depositions. The Clintons’ lawyers said the subpoenas are not legally valid.

‘It should be an interesting hearing, because if they’re going to hold the Clintons in contempt, I’m interested to hear if they’ll hold anyone else in contempt, including Republicans in this administration,’ Subramanyam said.

Multiple requests for comment to the remaining 19 Democrats on the committee went unanswered on Tuesday.

That includes Rep. Robert Garcia, D-Calif., the top Democrat on the committee, who did not attend either of the panel’s scheduled depositions with the Clintons in January.

Rep. Emily Randall, D-Wash., another member of the panel, even waved Fox News Digital off during an attempt to ask about her thoughts on the Clinton contempt effort. She claimed she was engaged in an ‘intense’ conversation with a congressional aide.

Garcia had previously accused House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer, R-Ky., of hypocrisy in trying to hold the Clintons accountable while not pushing harder to enforce the subpoena aimed at forcing the DOJ to release all of its Epstein files, which it has not yet done.

‘I think it’s incredibly hypocritical for James Comer to go out and try to hold in contempt his political enemies while [Attorney General Pam Bondi] is actively breaking the law, and he refuses to hold her in contempt,’ Garcia told MS NOW last week.

But in his opening remarks ahead of the committee meeting, Comer is expected to argue that it would be Democrats who are acting hypocritical if they do not vote to hold House-wide contempt votes.

‘We’ve offered flexibility on scheduling. The response we received was not cooperation, but defiance, marked by repeated delays, excuses, and obstruction,’ Comer will say, according to remarks obtained by Fox News Digital. ‘Today, the Clintons must be held accountable for their actions. And Democrats must support these measures, or they will be exposed as hypocrites.’

Neither of the Clintons have been implicated in any wrongdoing related to Epstein.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS
0 comment
0
FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

previous post
Former Rep MTG dumps cold water on Trump’s Greenland acquisition ambitions: ‘We’ve heard that one before’
next post
Secretary Rubio scheduled to face former colleagues on Venezuela policy

related articles

Hawley, Warren team up to back up Trump,...

March 26, 2026

Flashback: Jeffries called failing to fully fund DHS...

March 26, 2026

Indicted Democrat Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick faces rare House ethics...

March 26, 2026

Epstein’s accountant and lawyer reveal DOJ never questioned...

March 26, 2026

Your internet router could be China-linked: FCC cracks...

March 26, 2026

Democrats demand subpoena for Lewandowski over controversial $220M...

March 26, 2026

Soros-backed DA Krasner threatens ICE agents at Philly...

March 26, 2026

Machado tells US oil giants Venezuela will become...

March 26, 2026

Shanghai sabotage: Inside Singham’s secret strategy to demonize...

March 26, 2026

From Biden’s ‘war’ on gas prices to ‘small...

March 13, 2026
Enter Your Information Below To Receive Free Trading Ideas, Latest News, And Articles.


Your information is secure and your privacy is protected. By opting in you agree to receive emails from us. Remember that you can opt-out any time, we hate spam too!

Latest News

  • Hawley presses FBI to probe alleged Biden-era targeting of Christians

    March 26, 2025
  • Pro-life activist prosecuted by Biden DOJ reacts to Trump pardon: ‘I want to give him a hug’

    January 24, 2025
  • Firm that propelled Mamdani to victory in NY looks to unseat House GOP members in PA

    November 24, 2025
  • Orange juice importer says Brazil tariffs will squeeze American consumers

    July 22, 2025
  • First on Fox: Republican senators urged to ‘go on offense’ on DOGE goals, highlight work with Trump, Musk

    March 24, 2025

Popular Posts

  • 1

    District judges’ orders blocking Trump agenda face hearing in top Senate committee

    April 2, 2025
  • 2

    Secret Service admits leaning on ‘state and local partners’ after claim it ignored Trump team’s past requests

    July 21, 2024
  • 3

    Five more House Democrats call on Biden to drop out, third US senator

    July 19, 2024
  • 4

    CoreWeave eyes $1.5B bond raise to ease debt load following lacklustre IPO: report

    May 9, 2025
  • 5

    Forex Profit Calculator: Maximize Your Trading Potential

    July 10, 2024

Categories

  • Economy (829)
  • Editor's Pick (8,385)
  • Investing (1,419)
  • Stock (989)

Latest Posts

  • ‘New Golden Age’: Republican lawmakers ecstatic as Trump takes office with slate of new orders

    January 20, 2025
  • RAPT Therapeutics shares surge 64% as GSK agrees $2.2B acquisition

    January 20, 2026
  • Mars to acquire snack maker Kellanova in $36 billion deal

    August 14, 2024

Recent Posts

  • Mars acquires Kellanova for $36 billion, adds Pringles and Cheez-It to its portfolio

    August 14, 2024
  • Trump nominated for Nobel Peace Prize over Iran-Israel ceasefire deal

    June 24, 2025
  • Oil and natural gas: Oil falls to new July low on Friday

    July 22, 2024

Editor’s Pick

  • Tesla shares plunge 15%, steepest drop in five years

    March 11, 2025
  • Vance: Adversaries are ‘afraid’ of US military, and that makes tough talks like Putin possible

    August 13, 2025
  • White House criticizes judge’s decision not to unseal Epstein associate grand jury testimony

    August 12, 2025
  • About us
  • Contacts
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions

Disclaimer: moneyrisetoday.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

Copyright © 2025 moneyrisetoday.com | All Rights Reserved

Money Rise Today – Investing and Stock News
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
Money Rise Today – Investing and Stock News
  • Investing
  • Stock