• Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
Money Rise Today – Investing and Stock News
  • Investing
  • Stock
Editor's Pick

Jack Smith says Trump ‘willfully’ broke the law, blasts DOJ ‘retribution’ in second term

by January 22, 2026
written by January 22, 2026

Former special counsel prosecutor Jack Smith vigorously defended the decisions he made in investigating President Donald Trump after his first term in office,telling members of the House Judiciary Committee on Thursday that his team of prosecutors had uncovered ‘proof beyond a reasonable doubt’ that Trump had engaged in criminal activity.

‘Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in criminal activity,’ Smith said. ‘If asked whether to prosecute a former president based on the same facts today, I would do so— regardless of whether that president was a Republican or a Democrat,’ Smith said. 

Smith testified publicly for the first time Thursday about the dual special counsel investigation he led looking into Trump’s alleged effort to subvert the 2020 election and Trump’s alleged retention of certain classified documents. 

Smith brought charges against Trump in both cases, but they were ultimately dropped after Trump’s re-election, in keeping with longstanding Justice Department guidance.

Smith resigned shortly after Trump’s election to a second term in 2024.

But Smith said Thursday that he had no second thoughts about the actions he took as special counsel, stressing that the decisions that were made with regard to political party and in keeping with longstanding Justice Department policies.

The hearing became acrimonious at times, as House Judiciary Chairman Jim Jordan and other Republicans grilled Smith over certain decisions he made.

One area of focus was his decision to access so-called ‘tolling records’ of certain Republican lawmakers during the probe. Unlike wiretaps, tolling records are phone logs that reveal the phone numbers of incoming and outgoing callers, as well as the time and duration of calls. 

Republicans honed in on this detail Thursday, blasting the actions as ‘political weaponization.’ Smith, for his part, defended the tolling records as ‘common practice’ in such investigations.   

Smith previously said that the Public Integrity Section had signed off on the subpoenas, a point corroborated by previously released public records.

Other Republicans assailed Smith’s actions as ‘overly aggressive’ and beyond the scope of his authority. 

Rep. Kevin Kiley, R-Calif., meanwhile, blasted Smith for attempting to seek the ‘maximum litigation advantage at every turn, and ‘repeatedly circumventing constitutional limitations to the point that you had to be reined in again and again throughout the process.’

Trump, in Davos, also weighed in prior to the hearing.

Speaking at the World Economic Forum, Trump said ‘everybody now knows that’ the 2020 election was ‘rigged,’ and vowed that ‘people will soon be prosecuted for what they did.’ He did not immediately elaborate.

Still, Smith sought to impart on the panel his belief that the special counsel prosecutors had built a strong case against Trump. 

‘We observed legal requirements and took actions based on the facts and the law,’ Smith said, saying the decisions were made ‘without regard to President Trump’s political association.’

He also lamented the ousting of FBI agents and Justice Department officials, including members of the special counsel who he said have been fired or unfairly targeted in Trump’s first year back in office.

Trump, he said, ‘has sought to seek revenge against career prosecutors, FBI agents and support staff simply for having worked on these cases.’

‘To vilify and seek retribution against these people is wrong,’ Smith said. ‘Those dedicated public servants are the best of us, and it has been a privilege to serve with them.’

Thousands of FBI personnel in February were forced to fill out a sprawling questionnaire asking employees detailed questions about any role they may have played in the investigation into the Jan. 6, 2021, U.S. Capitol riots — ranging from whether they had testified in any criminal trials to when they last participated in investigation-related activity. 

In the months since, a handful of personnel involved in the Jan. 6 investigations have been abruptly fired as part of an effort that individuals familiar with the action described to Fox News as an act of ‘retaliation.’ 

The Justice Department also fired individuals who worked with Smith on the special counsel investigations, as Smith noted Thursday.

‘In my opinion, these people are the best of public servants, our country owes them a debt of gratitude, and we are all less safe because many of these experienced and dedicated law enforcement professionals have been fired,’ he said.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS
0 comment
0
FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

previous post
White House explains bruise on Trump’s hand
next post
BitGo prices IPO above range at $2B valuation: why the listing stands out

related articles

From Biden’s ‘war’ on gas prices to ‘small...

March 13, 2026

US diplomatic facility in Iraq struck by drone

March 13, 2026

171 million travelers face airport delays as Democrats’...

March 13, 2026

From Biden’s ‘war’ on gas prices to ‘small...

March 13, 2026

FDA launches new AI-powered system to track drug...

March 13, 2026

Cornyn reverses on filibuster stance to push Trump’s...

March 13, 2026

DAVID MARCUS: Sen Thune has no idea how...

March 13, 2026

Trump touts 5-0 sweep by endorsed candidates in...

March 13, 2026

US destroys 16 Iranian mine boats as Strait...

March 13, 2026

House GOP urges Trump to choke off Iran...

March 13, 2026
Enter Your Information Below To Receive Free Trading Ideas, Latest News, And Articles.


Your information is secure and your privacy is protected. By opting in you agree to receive emails from us. Remember that you can opt-out any time, we hate spam too!

Latest News

  • US escalates sanctions on Iranian officials as Trump considers military options

    January 30, 2026
  • Dem strategists say Harris ‘only practical choice’ as party leaders begin endorsing her

    July 21, 2024
  • SCHD ETF has pulled back: is it safe to buy the dip now?

    March 19, 2026
  • Adobe stock down 18% YTD before Q1 earnings: can AI spark rebound?

    March 12, 2026
  • Incoming Trump administration given new blueprint on ways to weaken Iran: ‘unique opportunity’

    January 13, 2025

Popular Posts

  • 1

    District judges’ orders blocking Trump agenda face hearing in top Senate committee

    April 2, 2025
  • 2

    Secret Service admits leaning on ‘state and local partners’ after claim it ignored Trump team’s past requests

    July 21, 2024
  • 3

    Five more House Democrats call on Biden to drop out, third US senator

    July 19, 2024
  • 4

    CoreWeave eyes $1.5B bond raise to ease debt load following lacklustre IPO: report

    May 9, 2025
  • 5

    Forex Profit Calculator: Maximize Your Trading Potential

    July 10, 2024

Categories

  • Economy (829)
  • Editor's Pick (8,376)
  • Investing (1,405)
  • Stock (981)

Latest Posts

  • 2 lone Republicans vote against Trump’s ‘big, beautiful bill’ as it heads to president’s desk

    July 3, 2025
  • Netanyahu calls Mideast conflicts choice between ‘blessing or a curse,’ warns about Israel’s ‘long arm’

    September 27, 2024
  • Rand Paul says GOP colleagues ‘don’t give a s‑‑t about these people in the boats’: They ‘say they’re pro-life’

    January 14, 2026

Recent Posts

  • GOPers press for the release of JFK, Epstein files: Here’s why they’re not released yet

    February 26, 2025
  • Vietnam urges work from home amid fuel supply, price crunch in Mideast

    March 10, 2026
  • Kelsey Grammer calls Trump ‘one of the greatest presidents we’ve ever had’ at Kennedy Center Honors

    December 7, 2025

Editor’s Pick

  • FDA launches new AI-powered system to track drug and vaccine side effects nationwide

    March 13, 2026
  • Netanyahu gifts Fetterman a silver-plated beeper after he praised Israel’s Lebanon pager operation

    March 20, 2025
  • Cracker Barrel rebrand: Why companies retreat when faced with consumer criticism

    August 29, 2025
  • About us
  • Contacts
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions

Disclaimer: moneyrisetoday.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

Copyright © 2025 moneyrisetoday.com | All Rights Reserved

Money Rise Today – Investing and Stock News
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
Money Rise Today – Investing and Stock News
  • Investing
  • Stock